Update to be compatible with Node 16

[0xf0xx0]

Ended up being three lines to remove.

Done on Linux 5.13.7-arch1-1 #1 SMP PREEMPT Sat, 31 Jul 2021 13:18:52 +0000 x86_64 GNU/Linux

[fredkilbourn]

Looking forward to seeing this merged, nice work!

[Milo123459]

Vital for DJS' V13! Great work

[DraftProducts]

Is there an approximative date for the merge?

[0xf0xx0]

@DraftProducts Most likely not since discord hasn't looked at this repo in a year, I'm thinkin of just making my fork the "main" active repo

[Milo123459]

@DraftProducts Most likely not since discord hasn't looked at this repo in a year, I'm thinkin of just making my fork the "main" active repo

Please do! Maybe publish it as an npm package rather than having to install via git!

[DraftProducts]

Maybe a ping to jasoncitron ? He is the biggest contributor🤔

[nemoralis]

You can install GingkathFox's repo with npm i GingkathFox/erlpack

[0xf0xx0]

@DraftProducts Most likely not since discord hasn't looked at this repo in a year, I'm thinkin of just making my fork the "main" active repo

Please do! Maybe publish it as an npm package rather than having to install via git!

@Milo123459 you can npm i GingkathFox/erlpack

[fredkilbourn]

Maybe open an issue on discord repo and reference this?

[JasonDevTech]

Hi guys, I've also wanted to know the status of this but I got a bit bored of waiting and decided to explore it on my own. I rewrote it to Typescript with browser support. Here's the repo if you guys want to check it out.

[DraftProducts]

Hi guys, I've also wanted to know the status of this but I got a bit bored of waiting and decided to explore it on my own. I rewrote it to Typescript with browser support. Here's the repo if you guys want to check it out.

It's a nice project, but I don't think that your package will give the same perfs as the official package with bindings 🤔

[Milo123459]

@jasoncitron could you take a look at this?

[fredkilbourn]

@jhgg @adill @zorkian @mezz @fozzle @samschlegel @night - tagging some more discord people that are contributors, this is blocking full optimization with the new discord.js v13 library, which requires node v16, which requires this pull (or similar) to work.

[0xf0xx0]

Merged #41 with this one since @Hazmi35 also updated deps

[DraftProducts]

We are now waiting about 10 days for this merge, I would make a fork of this repo and merge this PR myself.
Thanks @GingkathFox for the work 👍

[0xf0xx0]

Oh wow it's been 10 days already

Ig move to my fork?

[0xf0xx0]

I've put in a ticket to detatch my fork from the main repo

[Milo123459]

Your fork / published package doesn't work with DJS as it simply won't pick up your erlpack package.

[Milo123459]

Also I think it's a bit scummy to make a PR changing who maintains the repo. Also remove the pnpm lock

[icdevin]

This has no chance of being accepted as it exists now since it tells users to install his own repo and changes the name and author/maintainers...if you're going to spin off your own, do so and feel free tell people but it would've been wiser to leave this PR with just the changes needed for Node v16.

[Milo123459]

At this rate, either fix the PR with only needed changes, or someone make a new PR. It just makes no sense, changing the author, name, readme, etc to the name of your fork then attempting to make that change in the main repo? Doesn't make sense to me. Please revert to just needed changes

[fredkilbourn]

To be honest the best solution would be discord.js forking and maintaining this and not leaving users to fight for a fix. I've added an issue over there making the suggestion: discordjs/discord.js#6418 upvote over there if you agree.

[jhgg]

Well you took a mergeable PR and made it totally unmergable. Feel free to re open with the original change set.

[Milo123459]

Oh for gods sake :(

[0xf0xx0]

Oh whoops, I'll re-push with the proper fixes, didn't realize that would affect it

I like how this happens after everything lol

[Milo123459]

Oh whoops, I'll re-push with the proper fixes, didn't realize that would affect it

I like how this happens after everything lol

Not trying to be rude but how could you not see how this wouldn't affect it?

• Change Authors
• Renamed
• Add a pnpm-lock (unneeded)
• Then proceeded to make the main repo look like the fork?

[0xf0xx0]

Oh whoops, I'll re-push with the proper fixes, didn't realize that would affect it

I like how this happens after everything lol

Not trying to be rude but how could you not see how this wouldn't affect it?

• Change Authors

• Renamed

• Add a pnpm-lock (unneeded)

• Then proceeded to make the main repo look like the fork?

I didn't realize my fork was edited on the master, I thought it had created a new branch with the fixes

Also the pnpm lock should've been ignored, I use pnpm instead of npm

[Milo123459]

Pnpm lock should still be ignored