Skip to content

docs: roll ROADMAP tracker state after emptying the issue tracker - #1053

Merged
xerj-org merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs/tracker-roll-2026-09-29
Sep 30, 2026
Merged

xerj-org merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs/tracker-roll-2026-09-29

Conversation

@xerj-org

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Follow-up to the rc.78 cut (#1052), same day: the tracker was emptied.

What happened outside the tree (recorded here so the file matches reality):

In this tree — ROADMAP.md only:

Checks: docs_capability_lists 15/15 locally — the review-line
version token (v1.0.0-rc.78) and the Next release — rc.79 marker are
unchanged. CHANGELOG [Unreleased] entry added in the follow-up commit
citing this PR, per the merge-time rule.

…26-09-29)

The same day as the rc.78 cut, the last four open issues were closed —
#1038 and #1030 (their shipped halves are the rc.78 record: the size
epic's stage 1 at −26.1 % durable, the corpus-packs records half with
detached signatures) and the two carried defects #1031 (autoindex aborts
on a source file that grows mid-run) and #1032 (per-segment caches
unbounded until merge-retire), both closed as deferred, not fixed. The
pinned pointer #298 had already been closed as abandoned and is now
unpinned. The tracker is empty.

ROADMAP consequences, all in this commit:

- "In flight for rc.79" now says nothing is in flight; the three rc.78
  riders were closed the same day as the cut.
- "Open defects carried into rc.79" became "Open defects. None" with a
  deferred record of #1031/#1032 in plain text — plain text because the
  release-notes gate (check 1a) greps every issues/N link in this
  section against the live tracker at every cut, and both issues are
  now closed; linked closed issues there fail the next release branch.
- The pinned-issue bullet under "Follow the roadmap" is gone (#298 is
  closed and unpinned; this file and the CHANGELOG are the surface).
- The mail-ingest line and the corpus-hub item now state #1032/#1030's
  closed-as-deferred/descoped status instead of presenting them as open
  trackers.
- The review line gains one sentence recording the same-day closure.

Machine check: docs_capability_lists 15/15 locally (review-line version
token v1.0.0-rc.78 and Next-release rc.79 marker unchanged).
Merge-time rule: every PR that lands on main after a tag gets its
CHANGELOG citation now, not at the next cut, so the release-notes gate
(check 2, prev-tag..HEAD) finds it. One Documentation entry under
[Unreleased] citing PR #1053.
@cla-bot cla-bot Bot added the cla-signed label Sep 30, 2026
@xerj-org
xerj-org merged commit c8243ff into main Sep 30, 2026
22 checks passed
xerj-org added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2026
…d packs shipped in rc.78

Both agent-facing index files still said corpus packs were "planned, no
code" (landing/llms.txt:50, and the NOT-IMPLEMENTED list in
landing/llms-full.txt). False since v1.0.0-rc.78 (2026-09-29): PRs
#1046/#1047 (builder + rust-vulns showcase) and #1048 (signing/publish),
hardened by #1049-#1051, shipped `xerj corpus build` — a declarative
recipe becomes a checksummed portable pack of records (format_version
refusal, licence + provenance on every record), `corpus add --from`
verifies per-file SHA-256 and `--verify-sig` a detached ed25519
signature over SHA256SUMS, and the first pack is rebuilt, signed and
published daily as a dated GitHub Release.

The correction claims exactly what shipped, no more: it says plainly that
the PRE-INDEXED half (an already-indexed bundle you mount instead of
spending your own CPU-hours) and a hub directory beyond the first pack
remain unbuilt — matching ROADMAP.md's corpus-hub row, which was rolled
in #1053.

Edits follow each file's own precedent for status rolls so nothing is
restructured: llms.txt rewrites the one clause in the not-implemented
caveat using the same inline pattern the line already uses for the
v1.0.0-rc.77 object-storage roll, and adds docs/CORPUS_PACKS.md to the
"file that proves it" tail; llms-full.txt keeps the log-mode bullet,
points it at a new "left this list in v1.0.0-rc.78" paragraph modelled
on the object-storage one, and keeps the list's 2026-09-26 re-check date
(the new paragraph carries its own 2026-09-29 date instead of claiming a
full re-check) and its ~76-char wrap.

Known lag, deliberately untouched here: the linked answer page
landing/answers/does-xerj-support-s3-alerting-plugins.md (and its .html
twin) still carries the old "no code exists" wording; it needs its own
surgical PR.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant