Repository navigation
perf(board): load pages incrementally and patch live changes - #1879
Conversation
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
|
PR Summary by QodoLoad board pages incrementally and patch live task changes
AI Description
Diagram
High-Level Assessment
Files changed (20)
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 95478d8138
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
Code Review by Qodo
1.
|
|
@codex review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: dd614c1e92
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 8e776680e1
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 95d9006ce0
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex review |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Keep it up! Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
fix(integrations): enforce current task ownership
fix(integrations): preserve rapid legitimate edits
what changed?
board pagination waited for every page and kept reloading the whole board for polling and small realtime changes. show pages as they arrive, fetch bounded task changes, and guard cache patches against newer edits or reorders. keep broad refreshes for events that need them.
finding 11 from the codebase review.
based on #1878 (finding 08). merge that pr first; this diff contains only finding 11.
how did you check it?
incremental page loading, public boards, websocket cache races, local edit guards and pagination lifecycle tests.
checked the combined fix tree with the full workspace test run, uncached workspace typechecks, lint, i18n and openapi checks. postgres integration tests used disposable local test databases; provider and s3 calls were mocked.
Native GitHub stack #1886 (bottom to top): #1873 → #1876 → #1877 → #1878 → #1879 (this PR). Stack base:
fix/review-06-integration-scope, the shared #1867 foundation. Merge #1867 first, then move this stack's base tomainbefore merging board changes. If GitHub has not moved it automatically, unstack the still-open board PRs, retarget #1873 tomain, and recreate this native stack in the same order.Need help on this PR? Tag
@codesmith-botwith what you need. Autofix is disabled.