Open
Conversation
357d7fa to
ff40273
Compare
ff40273 to
abd9609
Compare
rodrigozhou
approved these changes
Apr 25, 2026
Comment on lines
954
to
963
| } else if _, ok := current[key]; !ok { | ||
| if _, aliasExists := currentAliasToField[value]; aliasExists { | ||
| d.logger.Warn( | ||
| fmt.Sprintf(errSearchAttributeAlreadyExistsMessage, value), | ||
| tag.String("visibility-search-attribute", value), | ||
| ) | ||
| continue | ||
| } | ||
| result[key] = value | ||
| } else { |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
nit
Suggested change
| } else if _, ok := current[key]; !ok { | |
| if _, aliasExists := currentAliasToField[value]; aliasExists { | |
| d.logger.Warn( | |
| fmt.Sprintf(errSearchAttributeAlreadyExistsMessage, value), | |
| tag.String("visibility-search-attribute", value), | |
| ) | |
| continue | |
| } | |
| result[key] = value | |
| } else { | |
| } else if _, aliasExists := currentAliasToField[value]; aliasExists { | |
| d.logger.Warn( | |
| fmt.Sprintf(errSearchAttributeAlreadyExistsMessage, value), | |
| tag.String("visibility-search-attribute", value), | |
| ) | |
| continue | |
| } else if _, ok := current[key]; !ok { | |
| result[key] = value | |
| } else { |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed?
Add check for duplicate aliases when registering search attributes in UpdateNamespace handler.
Why?
Registering search attributes through Operator handler checks for already registered aliases and fields, but this initial read has no checks for the version of the Namespace Config. UpdateNamespace handler does another read of the namespace config before attempting to write with the Config version as optimistic concurrency control, but this last validation only checks for competing field names. So, if a user registers the same search attribute alias at the same time, they can both be treated as valid updates, leading to undefined behavior when querying from visibility.
How did you test it?