SwiftLexicalLookup: Add Syntax Type Helpers for Member-Type Lookup#3378
Open
filip-sakel wants to merge 2 commits into
Open
SwiftLexicalLookup: Add Syntax Type Helpers for Member-Type Lookup#3378filip-sakel wants to merge 2 commits into
filip-sakel wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
@swift-ci please test |
1 similar comment
Contributor
Author
|
@swift-ci please test |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A follow-up to #3346 for the qualified name-lookup GSoC 2026 project.
Changes
NominalTypeDeclSyntax(struct, enum, class, actor, or protocol)TypeDeclSyntax(a nominal type declaration, type alias, or associated/generic type)TypeDeclSyntaxnodesTypeLikeSyntax(aTypeSyntaxorNominalTypeDeclSyntax)B, we first look for member types ofA, which means we generate a request to fully resolveA. Note that no type syntax referencesA; instead, we resolveAbecause the syntax is nested in a nominal-type declaration.TypeLikeSyntaxallows us to representstruct Aas the syntax initiating the request.NominalTypeDeclSyntax->NonProtocolNominalTypeDeclSyntax.