Skip to content

Don't extend implicit eval method #274

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
mloubout merged 2 commits into from
Oct 28, 2024
Merged

Don't extend implicit eval method #274

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
e238776
Don't extend implicit `eval` method
Keno Oct 17, 2024
7ff1cb3
tweak pycall return type for 1.11
mloubout Oct 17, 2024
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion ext/JLD2JUDIExt.jl
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ JUDI.Geometry(x::JLD2.ReconstructedMutable{N, FN, NT}) where {N, FN, NT} = Geome
function JUDI.tof32(x::JLD2.ReconstructedStatic{N, FN, NT}) where {N, FN, NT}
# Drop "typed" signature
reconstructT = Symbol(split(string(N), "{")[1])
return JUDI.tof32(eval(reconstructT)([getproperty(x, f) for f in FN]...))
return JUDI.tof32(getproperty(@__MODULE__, reconstructT)([getproperty(x, f) for f in FN]...))

@vtjnash vtjnash Oct 17, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
return JUDI.tof32(getproperty(@__MODULE__, reconstructT)([getproperty(x, f) for f in FN]...))
return JUDI.tof32(getglobal(@__MODULE__, reconstructT)([getproperty(x, f) for f in FN]...))

(assuming you only support v1.9 or later)

@Keno Keno Oct 17, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I believe there's a 1.6 compat, which is why I used get property. But yes, getglobal is preferred for 1.9+

end

end
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion src/TimeModeling/LinearOperators/lazy.jl
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -215,4 +215,4 @@ _as_src(::judiNoopOperator, ::AbstractModel, q::judiMultiSourceVector) = q

############################################################################################################################
###### Evaluate lazy operation
eval(rhs::judiRHS) = rhs.d
eval_lazy(rhs::judiRHS) = rhs.d
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions src/TimeModeling/Types/GeometryStructure.jl
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -39,9 +39,9 @@ function getproperty(G::Geometry, s::Symbol)
end
# Legacy dt/nt/t
if s in [:dt, :t, :nt, :t0]
return eval(Symbol("get_$(s)"))(G)
return getproperty(@__MODULE__, Symbol("get_$(s)"))(G)
end

return getfield(G, s)
end

Expand Down
8 changes: 4 additions & 4 deletions src/TimeModeling/Types/lazy_msv.jl
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -34,9 +34,9 @@ end
getindex(la::LazyAdd{D}, i::RangeOrVec) where D = LazyAdd{D}(length(i), la.A[i], la.B[i], la.sign)


function eval(ls::LazyAdd{D}) where D
aloc = eval(ls.A)
bloc = eval(ls.B)
function eval_lazy(ls::LazyAdd{D}) where D
aloc = eval_lazy(ls.A)
bloc = eval_lazy(ls.B)
ga = aloc.geometry
gb = bloc.geometry
@assert (ga.nt == gb.nt && ga.dt == gb.dt && ga.t == gb.t)
Expand All @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ function eval(ls::LazyAdd{D}) where D
end

function make_src(ls::LazyAdd{D}) where D
q = eval(ls)
q = eval_lazy(ls)
return q.geometry[1], q.data[1]
end

Expand Down