-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 190
fix(#947): only call refresh when auth token is expired #1087
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. Weβll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
phoenix-ru
merged 2 commits into
sidebase:main
from
anjarupnik:fix/947-refresh-not-triggered
Apr 2, 2026
+6
β4
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
While I fully agree with the proposed implementation, I think that we still should conditionally add the access token to headers as it was before to keep compatibility with servers which expect it:
Otherwise it can be considered a breaking change.
Note for the context:
localprovider would likely be deprecated in version 2 due to sometimes ambiguous implementations like the current one, where library doesn't know the full usecase, such as what is required by the underlying back-end for the refresh call. Instead, users will be able to customize the behaviour and exact requirements of their backend when #1062 lands (currently pending team review).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @phoenix-ru, thanks for the quick review. Iβve applied your suggestion. Keeping the access token in the headers conditionally makes sense here to preserve compatibility with backends that require it and to avoid a breaking change.
I also like the direction of the new approach, because cases like this show how hard it is for the library to support every backend-specific use case. For example, with the current approach, we may refresh the token unnecessarily on every page load, since we do not check whether the existing token is expired first.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, I will do a functional check tomorrow and we can merge this