docs: Added README and related repo doc files - #56
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughTwo new documentation files have been added to the Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes Suggested reviewers
Note ⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (6)
README.md (3)
3-5: Minor wording improvements for clarityThe current phrasing is a bit repetitive (“packages … tools and libraries” + “packages are open source and maintained and used”). Consider tightening the copy:
-The cli_tools repository houses packages with tools and libraries to support CLI command development. - -These packages are open source and maintained and used by Serverpod. +The cli_tools repository contains open-source packages that help you build CLI commands. +They are actively maintained and used by the Serverpod team.
11-11: Grammar / punctuation nitpickInsert a colon after “for example” (or rephrase) to avoid a run-on sentence.
-The [cli_tools package](packages/cli_tools/README.md) contains a number of tools and libraries for CLI development, for example terminal logging, user input prompting, and collecting usage analytics. +The [cli_tools package](packages/cli_tools/README.md) offers several utilities for CLI development, for example: terminal logging, user-input prompting, and usage-analytics collection.
14-16: Add reciprocal link back to root README in CONTRIBUTING.mdSince the README points to CONTRIBUTING, add a “Back to README” link at the end of CONTRIBUTING.md to create a two-way navigation path. Improves DX without extra maintenance burden.
CONTRIBUTING.md (3)
24-24: Section heading grammar
### Code styleis fine, but you may want to capitalize consistently (“Code Style”) to match other headings (“Running the tests”, “Introducing new dependencies”).
44-44: Tighten wording & possessive apostropheSmall grammar issues: “projects git history” should be “project’s Git history”; sentence is long and flagged by LanguageTool.
-To keep the projects git history clean, we will squash PRs before merging. Therefore, it is essential that each pull request only contains a single feature or bug fix. Keeping pull requests small also makes it easier to review the changes which in turn speeds up the review process. +To keep the project’s Git history clean, we squash PRs before merging. Each pull request should therefore focus on a single feature or bug fix. Smaller PRs are easier to review, which, in turn, accelerates the review process.
54-54: Pluralize “issue” and improve phrasing-Help us make these packages better by filing [issue](https://github.com/serverpod/cli_tools/issues/new) for bugs, feature requests, or improvements. +Help us improve these packages by filing [issues](https://github.com/serverpod/cli_tools/issues/new) for bugs, feature requests, or other improvements.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
CONTRIBUTING.md(1 hunks)README.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📚 Learning: assertions should not be used in production code in the serverpod/cli_tools repository, as they are ...
Learnt from: christerswahn
PR: serverpod/cli_tools#46
File: lib/src/config/options.dart:313-316
Timestamp: 2025-05-15T07:45:59.256Z
Learning: Assertions should not be used in production code in the serverpod/cli_tools repository, as they are only active in development mode and not in production builds.
Applied to files:
README.md
🪛 LanguageTool
CONTRIBUTING.md
[style] ~44-~44: Consider using a different verb to strengthen your wording.
Context: ...ier to review the changes which in turn speeds up the review process. Before the Serverp...
(SPEED_UP_ACCELERATE)
[style] ~54-~54: The wording of this phrase can be improved.
Context: .... ## Contributing with issues Help us make these packages better by filing [issue](https://github.com/se...
(MAKE_STYLE_BETTER)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
CONTRIBUTING.md (1)
16-18: Empty “Roadmap” sectionThe “## Roadmap” heading does not currently contain any content. Either populate it with a short roadmap paragraph or remove the heading to avoid confusion.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
CONTRIBUTING.md (5)
22-22: Preposition & article mis-use
“declare your interest on an issue” → “declare your interest in an issue”.-Pull requests are very much welcome. If you are working on something more significant than just a smaller bug fix, please declare your interest on an issue first. +Pull requests are very much welcome. If you are working on something more significant than a small bug fix, please declare your interest in an issue first.
26-27: Tighten repetitive wording
“follow the linter rules” is repeated twice in one sentence – trim for brevity.-When you write code, make sure to use `dart format` and `dart analyze` to ensure that the code follows the linter rules. +When you write code, run `dart format` and `dart analyze` to ensure it complies with the linter.
32-32: Clarify test execution step
Current phrasing is slightly awkward; propose a clearer instruction.-To run the tests in a package, set the current directory to it and run `dart test`. +From the package directory, execute `dart test` to run its tests.
44-45: Possessive & subject-verb agreement
- “projects git history” → “project’s Git history”.
- “pull request only contains” → “pull request contains”.
- Add a comma before the non-restrictive clause.
-To keep the projects git history clean, we will squash PRs before merging. Therefore, it is essential that each pull request only contains a single feature or bug fix. Keeping pull requests small also makes it easier to review the changes which in turn speeds up the review process. +To keep the project’s Git history clean, we squash PRs before merging. Therefore, each pull request should contain a single feature or bug fix. Keeping PRs small also makes it easier to review the changes, which in turn speeds up the review process.
54-54: Singular/plural mismatch
“filing issue” → “filing issues” or “filing an issue”.-Help us make these packages better by filing [issue](https://github.com/serverpod/cli_tools/issues/new) for bugs, feature requests, or improvements. +Help us make these packages better by filing [issues](https://github.com/serverpod/cli_tools/issues/new) for bugs, feature requests, or improvements.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
CONTRIBUTING.md(1 hunks)README.md(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- README.md
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
CONTRIBUTING.md
[style] ~44-~44: Consider using a different verb to strengthen your wording.
Context: ...ier to review the changes which in turn speeds up the review process. Before the Serverp...
(SPEED_UP_ACCELERATE)
[style] ~54-~54: The wording of this phrase can be improved.
Context: .... ## Contributing with issues Help us make these packages better by filing [issue](https://github.com/se...
(MAKE_STYLE_BETTER)
2 participants
Created a README.md in the repository root that links to the package-specific READMEs.
Copied the CONTRIBUTING.md file from the serverpod repo and adapted it for cli_tools.
Summary by CodeRabbit