Skip to content

build(deps): bump network-connectors to 1.8 - #405

Open
MatiasOS wants to merge 1 commit into
devfrom
issue-396-connectors-1-8
Open

MatiasOS wants to merge 1 commit into
devfrom
issue-396-connectors-1-8

Conversation

@MatiasOS

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description

Bumps @openscan/network-connectors from 1.7 to 1.8. Release 1.8.0 ships ZcashClient (the Zebra RPC surface), and it fixes bip122: routing so Bitcoin and Zcash chain IDs no longer collide on their shared CAIP-2 prefix.

This is the first PR in the Zcash stack for #398; the following PRs build on it.

Related Issue

Closes #396

Type of Change

  • Bug fix
  • New feature
  • Documentation update
  • Refactoring
  • Performance improvement
  • Other (please describe): dependency bump

Changes Made

  • package.json: @openscan/network-connectors goes from 1.7 to 1.8
  • bun.lock: now resolves @openscan/network-connectors@1.8.0, with no other lockfile changes

Screenshots (if applicable)

N/A

Checklist

  • I have run npm run format:fix and npm run lint:fix
  • I have run npm run typecheck with no errors
  • I have run tests with npm run test:run
  • I have tested my changes locally
  • I have updated documentation if needed
  • My code follows the project's architecture patterns

Additional Notes

Checked against the acceptance criteria in #396:

  • ClientFactory.createClient still returns BitcoinClient for Bitcoin mainnet and testnet4, and returns ZcashClient for both Zcash chain IDs.
  • rpcConfig.ts and useRpcLatencyTest.ts still typecheck against the widened rpcUrls type; npm run typecheck is clean.
  • npm run build passes.
  • The live Bitcoin e2e suite passes (24/24).
  • npm run test:run passes (105 tests).

Biome still reports one warning, which already exists on dev: the unused getAlchemyBtcUrl in src/components/pages/settings/index.tsx.

1.8.0 ships ZcashClient and routes bip122 chain IDs by registry membership, so Bitcoin and Zcash IDs no longer collide on the shared prefix.
@MatiasOS
MatiasOS added this pull request to stack #414 September 15, 2026 00:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant