Persistence DSL Extensions: delete some text#2726
Open
dilyanpalauzov wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
✅ Thanks for your pull request to the openHAB documentation! The result can be previewed at the URL below (this comment and the preview will be updated if you add more commits).Built without sensitive environment variables
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This deleted text is implied by the preceding sentence: “To make use of persisted states inside scripts and rules, a few useful extensions have been defined on items.”
The next deleted sentence:
is in a section called “Persistence Extensions in Scripts and Rules”. If the extensions are not generally availbale in Scritps and Rules, the documentation should state, where the extensions are generally available.
I see also no use-case, which might lead to a confusion, which confusion would not exist, if the herein deleted sentences are kept. As next follow anyway only example, all of which have the form
<item>.method(…).