Skip to content

docs: add Simplified Chinese and Japanese READMEs - #85

Merged
vernonstinebaker merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/readme-translations
Oct 3, 2026
Merged

vernonstinebaker merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/readme-translations

Conversation

@vernonstinebaker

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Re-land of #81 (@tura-ai-agent) with identical content. The original fork PR cannot produce CI runs — GitHub holds workflow runs for first-time contributors and none were ever created, so the four required checks can never report there (no "Approve and run" affordance either). Landing the same diff in-repo, where checks run automatically.

  • README.zh-CN.md and README.ja.md mirror the current English README (features, quick start, CLI usage, architecture)
  • README.md gains the language nav line

Credited via Co-authored-by. Closes #81 once merged.

Re-land of #81 by tura-ai-agent: the fork PR cannot trigger CI runs
(first-time contributor), so the identical content is landed in-repo
where checks run automatically.

Co-authored-by: tura-ai-agent <302527399+tura-ai-agent@users.noreply.github.com>

@DonPrus DonPrus left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed both translations against the English README, including the installation prerequisites, CLI behavior, proxy configuration, Mission Control/replay contracts and development instructions. All fenced code blocks and inline technical identifiers match the English source, and the relative navigation/documentation links resolve. I found no omitted technical sections or translation changes that alter the documented behavior.

I also read the original #81 discussion/review and compared its three README files byte-for-byte with this PR: the content is identical, and the original contributor is credited in the commit. #81 is already closed as superseded, so this is a replacement rather than an additional competing implementation. The PR merges cleanly with current main and the four CI checks are green. No blocking findings.

@vernonstinebaker
vernonstinebaker merged commit 0650546 into main Oct 3, 2026
4 checks passed
@vernonstinebaker
vernonstinebaker deleted the docs/readme-translations branch October 3, 2026 16:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants