Skip to content

Proper type checking #130

Description

@SamDuffield

We should consider modifying the code to support a type checker - most likely pyright.

It might be a big PR but shouldn't change any functionality and it would make the codebase much less error-prone.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or request (beyond just a new method)

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions