Update dependency undici to v7.29.0 [SECURITY] by renovate[bot] · Pull Request #62 · nasnet-community/connect

renovate · 2026-06-20T15:48:43Z

ℹ️ Note

This PR body was truncated due to platform limits.

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Change	Age	Confidence
undici (source)	`7.24.4` → `7.29.0`

Undici proxy-authorization header not cleared on cross-origin redirect in fetch

CVE-2024-24758 / GHSA-3787-6prv-h9w3

More information

Details

Impact

Undici already cleared Authorization headers on cross-origin redirects, but did not clear Proxy-Authorization headers.

Patches

This is patched in v5.28.3 and v6.6.1

Workarounds

There are no known workarounds.

References

Severity

CVSS Score: 3.9 / 10 (Low)
Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).

Undici's Proxy-Authorization header not cleared on cross-origin redirect for dispatch, request, stream, pipeline

CVE-2024-30260 / GHSA-m4v8-wqvr-p9f7

More information

Details

Impact

Undici cleared Authorization and Proxy-Authorization headers for fetch(), but did not clear them for undici.request().

Patches

This has been patched in nodejs/undici@6805746.
Fixes has been released in v5.28.4 and v6.11.1.

Workarounds

use fetch() or disable maxRedirections.

References

Linzi Shang reported this.

Severity

CVSS Score: 3.9 / 10 (Low)
Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).

Undici's fetch with integrity option is too lax when algorithm is specified but hash value is in incorrect

CVE-2024-30261 / GHSA-9qxr-qj54-h672

More information

Details

Impact

If an attacker can alter the integrity option passed to fetch(), they can let fetch() accept requests as valid even if they have been tampered.

Patches

Fixed in nodejs/undici@d542b8c.
Fixes has been released in v5.28.4 and v6.11.1.

Workarounds

Ensure that integrity cannot be tampered with.

References

https://hackerone.com/reports/2377760

Severity

CVSS Score: 2.6 / 10 (Low)
Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).

Use of Insufficiently Random Values in undici

CVE-2025-22150 / GHSA-c76h-2ccp-4975

More information

Details

Impact

Undici fetch() uses Math.random() to choose the boundary for a multipart/form-data request. It is known that the output of Math.random() can be predicted if several of its generated values are known.

If there is a mechanism in an app that sends multipart requests to an attacker-controlled website, they can use this to leak the necessary values. Therefore, An attacker can tamper with the requests going to the backend APIs if certain conditions are met.

Patches

This is fixed in 5.28.5; 6.21.1; 7.2.3.

Workarounds

Do not issue multipart requests to attacker controlled servers.

References

Severity

CVSS Score: 6.8 / 10 (Medium)
Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).

undici Denial of Service attack via bad certificate data

CVE-2025-47279 / GHSA-cxrh-j4jr-qwg3

More information

Details

Impact

Applications that use undici to implement a webhook-like system are vulnerable. If the attacker set up a server with an invalid certificate, and they can force the application to call the webhook repeatedly, then they can cause a memory leak.

Patches

This has been patched in https://github.com/nodejs/undici/pull/4088.

Workarounds

If a webhook fails, avoid keep calling it repeatedly.

References

Reported as: https://github.com/nodejs/undici/issues/3895

Severity

CVSS Score: 3.1 / 10 (Low)
Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).

Undici has an HTTP Request/Response Smuggling issue

CVE-2026-1525 / GHSA-2mjp-6q6p-2qxm

More information

Details

Impact

Undici allows duplicate HTTP Content-Length headers when they are provided in an array with case-variant names (e.g., Content-Length and content-length). This produces malformed HTTP/1.1 requests with multiple conflicting Content-Length values on the wire.

Who is impacted:

Applications using undici.request(), undici.Client, or similar low-level APIs with headers passed as flat arrays
Applications that accept user-controlled header names without case-normalization

Potential consequences:

Denial of Service: Strict HTTP parsers (proxies, servers) will reject requests with duplicate Content-Length headers (400 Bad Request)
HTTP Request Smuggling: In deployments where an intermediary and backend interpret duplicate headers inconsistently (e.g., one uses the first value, the other uses the last), this can enable request smuggling attacks leading to ACL bypass, cache poisoning, or credential hijacking

Patches

Patched in the undici version v7.24.0 and v6.24.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later.

Workarounds

If upgrading is not immediately possible:

Validate header names: Ensure no duplicate Content-Length headers (case-insensitive) are present before passing headers to undici
Use object format: Pass headers as a plain object ({ 'content-length': '123' }) rather than an array, which naturally deduplicates by key
Sanitize user input: If headers originate from user input, normalize header names to lowercase and reject duplicates

Severity

CVSS Score: 6.5 / 10 (Medium)
Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).

Undici has CRLF Injection in undici via `upgrade` option

CVE-2026-1527 / GHSA-4992-7rv2-5pvq

More information

Details

Impact

When an application passes user-controlled input to the upgrade option of client.request(), an attacker can inject CRLF sequences (\r\n) to:

Inject arbitrary HTTP headers
Terminate the HTTP request prematurely and smuggle raw data to non-HTTP services (Redis, Memcached, Elasticsearch)

The vulnerability exists because undici writes the upgrade value directly to the socket without validating for invalid header characters:

// lib/dispatcher/client-h1.js:1121
if (upgrade) {
  header += `connection: upgrade\r\nupgrade: ${upgrade}\r\n`
}

Patches

Patched in the undici version v7.24.0 and v6.24.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later.

Workarounds

Sanitize the upgrade option string before passing to undici:

function sanitizeUpgrade(value) {
  if (/[\r\n]/.test(value)) {
    throw new Error('Invalid upgrade value')
  }
  return value
}

client.request({
  upgrade: sanitizeUpgrade(userInput)
})

Severity

CVSS Score: 4.6 / 10 (Medium)
Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).

undici vulnerable to TLS certificate validation bypass via dropped requestTls in SOCKS5 ProxyAgent

CVE-2026-9697 / GHSA-vmh5-mc38-953g

More information

Details

Impact

undici's ProxyAgent silently drops the requestTls option when configured with a SOCKS5 proxy URI (socks5:// or socks://). The target HTTPS connection through the SOCKS5 tunnel falls back to Node's default trust store, ignoring user-configured ca, cert, key, rejectUnauthorized, and servername settings.

Applications that pin to an internal or corporate CA via requestTls.ca will, when their proxy URI is SOCKS5, get the default Mozilla CA bundle as the trust anchor instead. Any cert signed by any publicly-trusted CA for the target hostname is accepted, breaking the intended pin and enabling MITM read and tamper of the HTTPS exchange.

Affected applications are those that use undici's ProxyAgent (or Socks5ProxyAgent directly) with SOCKS5 AND rely on requestTls for TLS scope restriction. The bug was introduced in undici 7.23.0 when SOCKS5 support was added.

Patches

Upgrade to undici v7.28.0 or v8.5.0.

Workarounds

No workaround is available within the SOCKS5 path. If a SOCKS5 proxy with TLS scope restriction is required and an upgrade is not yet possible, route the traffic through an HTTP-proxy ProxyAgent instead, where requestTls is honored correctly.

Severity

CVSS Score: 7.4 / 10 (High)
Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).

undici vulnerable to cross-user information disclosure via shared cache whitespace bypass

CVE-2026-9678 / GHSA-pr7r-676h-xcf6

More information

Details

Impact

Undici's cache interceptor incorrectly classifies some responses as cacheable when the upstream Cache-Control header uses whitespace-padded qualified private or no-cache field names such as private=" authorization" or no-cache="\tauthorization". The parser preserves the surrounding whitespace, so later comparisons against the literal authorization field name fail and the response is stored.

In shared-cache mode, this allows a response containing one user's authenticated data to be served from cache to a subsequent caller, including an unauthenticated caller, when both requests resolve to the same cache key.

Affected applications are those that explicitly enable the cache interceptor (interceptors.cache()) in shared mode, forward Authorization headers upstream, and receive cacheable responses with non-canonical qualified private or no-cache directives.

Patches

Upgrade to undici v7.28.0 or v8.5.0.

Workarounds

If upgrade is not immediately possible, disable shared-cache mode for traffic that includes Authorization headers, avoid caching responses to authenticated requests, or add Vary: Authorization upstream.

Severity

CVSS Score: 5.9 / 10 (Medium)
Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).

undici vulnerable to cross-origin request routing via SOCKS5 proxy pool reuse

CVE-2026-6734 / GHSA-hm92-r4w5-c3mj

More information

Details

Impact

When using Socks5ProxyAgent, undici reuses a single connection pool across different origins without verifying that the pool's origin matches the requested origin. All requests are dispatched through the pool connected to the first origin, regardless of the intended destination.

This causes cross-origin request routing: credentials and request data intended for origin B are sent to origin A, responses from the wrong origin are trusted, and HTTPS requests may be silently downgraded to HTTP.

Impacted users are applications that use Socks5ProxyAgent (directly or via setGlobalDispatcher) and make requests to more than one origin.

This was introduced in undici 7.23.0 via #4385 and affects all versions through 8.1.0.

Patches

Upgrade to undici v7.28.0 or v8.2.0

Workarounds

Use a separate Socks5ProxyAgent instance per origin, or avoid using Socks5ProxyAgent with multiple origins.

Severity

CVSS Score: 7.5 / 10 (High)
Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).

undici vulnerable to HTTP response queue poisoning via keep-alive socket reuse

CVE-2026-6733 / GHSA-35p6-xmwp-9g52

More information

Details

Impact

Undici's HTTP/1.1 client is vulnerable to response queue poisoning on reused keep-alive sockets. An attacker-controlled upstream server can inject an unsolicited HTTP/1.1 response onto an idle socket after a request completes. When the client dispatches the next request on that socket, it associates the injected response with the new request, causing responses to be delivered to the wrong requests.

This requires an attacker-controlled or compromised upstream HTTP/1.1 server and keep-alive connection reuse.

Patches

Upgrade to undici v6.27.0, v7.28.0 or v8.5.0.

Workarounds

Disable keep-alive connection reuse by setting keepAliveTimeout: 0 on the Client or Pool.

Severity

CVSS Score: 3.7 / 10 (Low)
Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).

undici vulnerable to HTTP header injection via Set-Cookie percent-decoding

CVE-2026-9679 / GHSA-p88m-4jfj-68fv

More information

Details

Impact

undici's cookie parser in parseSetCookie percent-decodes cookie values via qsUnescape, turning encoded sequences like %0D%0A, %00, %3B, and %3D into their literal byte equivalents. RFC 6265 §5.4 does not specify any decoding and browsers do not decode either.

Applications that parse a Set-Cookie header and then forward the parsed value into a response header (proxies, middleware, SSR frameworks) become vulnerable to HTTP response header injection: an attacker-controlled upstream can inject arbitrary Set-Cookie, Location, or Cache-Control headers into the application's downstream response, enabling session fixation, open redirect, or cache poisoning.

Affected applications are those that use undici's cookie parsing (parseSetCookie, parseCookie, getSetCookies) and forward the parsed cookie value into a response header.

This was introduced in undici 7.0.0 via #3789.

Patches

Upgrade to undici v6.27.0, v7.28.0 or v8.5.0.

Workarounds

If upgrade is not immediately possible, do not forward values returned by parseSetCookie/parseCookie/getSetCookies directly into response headers; sanitize the value first to strip or reject CR, LF, NUL, ;, and = bytes.

Severity

CVSS Score: 5.9 / 10 (Medium)
Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).

undici vulnerable to Set-Cookie SameSite attribute downgrade via permissive substring matching

CVE-2026-11525 / GHSA-g8m3-5g58-fq7m

More information

Details

Impact

When undici parses a Set-Cookie header, it accepts any SameSite attribute value that contains Strict, Lax, or None as a substring, rather than the case-insensitive exact match specified by RFC 6265. Non-spec values are silently mapped to one of the three standard tokens:

SameSite=NoneOfYourBusiness is parsed as None, the most permissive setting.
SameSite=StrictLax is parsed as Lax, a downgrade from Strict.

Affected applications are those that consume Set-Cookie headers from server responses (for example via undici's fetch or proxy code paths) and then forward or rely on the parsed sameSite attribute. A malicious or non-compliant server can coerce the consumer's view of a cookie's SameSite policy to a weaker value, silently degrading the SameSite enforcement the cookie is supposed to provide.

This was introduced in undici 5.15.0 when the cookies feature was added.

Patches

Upgrade to undici v6.27.0, v7.28.0 or v8.5.0.

Workarounds

After parsing a Set-Cookie header, validate that the resulting sameSite attribute is one of 'Strict', 'Lax', or 'None' (exact, case-insensitive) before forwarding or relying on it.

Severity

CVSS Score: 3.7 / 10 (Low)
Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).

undici vulnerable to cross-user information disclosure and parse-time crash via degenerate private cache directives

CVE-2026-13697 / GHSA-4cwx-7wf7-3272

More information

Details

Summary

Two issues in undici's cache interceptor, both fixed by the same patch on lib/util/cache.js:

Shared-cache disclosure: Responses with malformed qualified Cache-Control: private directives such as private="" or private="," can be incorrectly stored in the default shared cache, then served to a later caller with the same cache key.
Parse-time crash: Mixed unqualified-and-qualified private directives in the same header (such as public, max-age=60, private, private="hdr") cause an uncaught TypeError in the cache-control parser, terminating the request.

Impact

Shared-cache disclosure

Applications using interceptors.cache() in shared mode may cache a user-specific response and serve it to a later caller with the same cache key. This can disclose private response bodies and headers, including Set-Cookie.

Required conditions:

the cache interceptor is enabled in shared mode, including the default configuration;
an upstream returns a malformed directive such as Cache-Control: public, max-age=300, private="";
another request later matches the same cache key, without a separating Vary header.

Parse-time crash

Applications using interceptors.cache() against an upstream that returns a Cache-Control header combining unqualified private with qualified private="..." see an uncaught TypeError: output.private.concat is not a function during response handling. The request rejects; depending on the consumer's error handling, the process may exit.

Details

private="" is parsed as { private: [''] }. The shared-cache guard only rejects private === true, so the response can be stored. When served from cache, the previous user's body and headers may be returned to a different user.

For the crash variant, an unqualified private directive sets output.private = true, then a subsequent qualified private="hdr" directive attempts output.private.concat(['hdr']), which throws because boolean has no concat method.

The patch routes the qualified-directive path through a shared helper that normalizes empty-after-trim arrays to true and preserves existing true values, closing both vectors.

Patches

Upgrade to undici 7.29.0 or 8.9.0. Both releases fix the qualified private directive handling that caused the shared-cache storage and the parser crash.

Workarounds

Until patched, avoid shared interceptors.cache() for user-specific responses, use type: 'private', or disable caching for affected origins.

Credit

Disclosure variant reported by @h0rk1p via HackerOne report #3817497.

Severity

CVSS Score: 7.4 / 10 (High)
Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).

undici vulnerable to downstream response desynchronization via retry interceptor

CVE-2026-16728 / GHSA-8xcm-r25x-g524

More information

Details

Impact

Undici's interceptors.retry() can deliver a response whose body length does not match the Content-Length header exposed to the application after a retry or resume of a partial response. Applications that use interceptors.retry() and forward upstream response headers and bodies downstream, for example proxy or gateway applications, may emit an invalid HTTP response with a stale Content-Length header. This can lead to downstream response desynchronization, connection hangs, or response corruption in clients or intermediaries that rely on the forwarded framing metadata.

A malicious or faulty upstream can respond to a range request with a 206 Partial Content response such as:

Content-Range: bytes 0-99/300
Content-Length: 300

and then send only 99 bytes before closing the socket. interceptors.retry() can then retry with Range: bytes=99-99, receive the final byte, and deliver a 100-byte body to the application while the response headers still contain Content-Length: 300 from the first response.

The bug requires interceptors.retry() to be enabled, an upstream that returns a partial response with a mismatched framing header, and a downstream forwarder that does not remove or recalculate Content-Length.

Patches

Patched in undici v6.28.0, v7.29.0, and v8.9.0. Users should upgrade to one of these versions or later.

Workarounds

Disable interceptors.retry() for untrusted upstreams.
Remove or recalculate Content-Length before forwarding a response body assembled or transformed by Undici.

Severity

CVSS Score: 4.8 / 10 (Medium)
Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).

undici vulnerable to cookie attribute injection via unsanitized domain and unparsed setCookie fields

CVE-2026-16729 / GHSA-v3r7-h72x-cjcm

More information

Details

Impact

The setCookie function has two attribute injection paths. validateCookieDomain does not reject semicolons (validateCookiePath already does at 0x3B), so a domain value like example.com; SameSite=None lands verbatim as Domain=example.com; SameSite=None. The unparsed array's loop only checks each entry contains = and does not sanitize values, so an entry like X-Custom=val; HttpOnly lands unchanged, injecting HttpOnly without the caller setting cookie.httpOnly = true.

Applications that pass user-controlled input to these fields, typically multi-tenant or reverse-proxy servers that scope session cookies to a tenant-supplied domain, can have SameSite CSRF protections bypassed, Secure or HttpOnly forced or stripped, or the intended SameSite tier overridden.

Patches

Patched in undici v6.28.0, v7.29.0, and v8.9.0.

Workarounds

Sanitize domain values against the RFC 1034 letter-digit-hyphen set before passing to setCookie.
Do not pass user-controlled data to the unparsed field.

Severity

CVSS Score: 4.8 / 10 (Medium)
Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).

undici vulnerable to cross-user information disclosure via whitespace around equals in Cache-Control directives

CVE-2026-14643 / GHSA-jr45-8vmc-qm54

More information

Details

Impact

Undici's cache interceptor mishandles optional whitespace (OWS) placed around the = of a qualified no-cache or private Cache-Control directive, such as no-cache ="authorization" (OWS before =) or no-cache= "authorization" (OWS after =). The parser either drops the directive entirely or stores a field name with literal quote characters, so the downstream cache decisions do not recognize the qualification and the response is stored.

In shared-cache mode, this allows a response containing one user's authenticated data to be served from cache to a subsequent caller, including an unauthenticated caller, when both requests resolve to the same cache key. The impact class is identical to CVE-2026-9678 (GHSA-pr7r-676h-xcf6); this advisory covers the whitespace-around-= bypass that the earlier fix did not normalize.

Affected applications are those that explicitly enable the cache interceptor (interceptors.cache()) in shared mode, forward Authorization headers upstream, and receive cacheable responses with qualified private or no-cache directives whose field-name list is padded with OWS around the =.

Patches

Upgrade to undici v7.29.0 or v8.9.0.

Workarounds

If upgrade is not immediately possible, disable shared-cache mode for traffic that includes Authorization headers, avoid caching responses to authenticated requests, or add Vary: Authorization upstream.

Severity

CVSS Score: 5.9 / 10 (Medium)
Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).

undici vulnerable to CRLF Injection via blob-like body 'type' property

CVE-2026-15157 / GHSA-m8rv-5g2x-5cg5

More information

Details

Impact

When an application passes a duck-typed blob-like body to undici's HTTP/1.1 dispatcher (via request(), stream(), pipeline(), or dispatch()) with a .type derived from untrusted input, an attacker can inject CRLF sequences (\r\n) to append arbitrary HTTP headers and potentially smuggle a second request past the upstream.

The vulnerable branch in lib/dispatcher/client-h1.js pushes body.type directly into the outgoing headers with no validation, while every other header path in undici goes through isValidHeaderValue():

} else if (util.isBlobLike(body) && request.contentType == null && body.type) {
  headers.push('content-type', body.type)  // bypasses isValidHeaderValue()
}

The bug requires a hand-rolled duck-typed blob object or a Blob subclass with a controlled .type. Native Blob is safe because its constructor strips CRLF from .type. fetch() is unaffected because it validates via the Headers class. Ecosystem consumers that build duck-typed blob shapes from user input include form-data-encoder, formdata-polyfill, and formdata-node.

Same defect class as CVE-2022-35948 (explicit content-type sink, fixed in undici 5.8.2) and CVE-2026-1527 (upgrade option sink, fixed in 6.24.0 / 7.24.0), both closed by adding isValidHeaderValue() on their respective sinks. This branch was missed.

Patches

Patched in undici v6.28.0, v7.29.0, and v8.9.0. Users should upgrade to one of these versions or later.

Workarounds

Set an explicit, validated content-type header on the request options (skips the vulnerable branch).
Use a native Blob (or fetch-blob) instead of a hand-rolled duck-typed object.
Reject control characters in the MIME type before assigning it to .type.
Use fetch() instead of the non-fetch APIs.

Severity

CVSS Score: 4.2 / 10 (Medium)
Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).

Release Notes

nodejs/undici (undici)

⚠️ Security Release

This release line addresses 7 security advisories, all shipped in v7.28.0.

Action required: Upgrade to undici 7.28.0 or later.
npm install undici@^7.28.0

The v7 line is not affected by GHSA-38rv-x7px-6hhq (CVE-2026-9675), which is
an 8.x-only regression.

Note on GHSA-hm92-r4w5-c3mj: this fix shipped in v7.28.0, not the
earlier 7.2x line — the vulnerable single-pool code was still present through
v7.27.2. The per-origin pool fix is
3805b8f8 (#5041).

Summary

Advisory	CVE	Severity (CVSS)	Fixed in	Fix commit
GHSA-vxpw-j846-p89q	CVE-2026-12151	High (7.5)	7.28.0	`8cb10f98`
GHSA-vmh5-mc38-953g	CVE-2026-9697	High (7.4)	7.28.0	`04201f89`
GHSA-hm92-r4w5-c3mj	CVE-2026-6734	High (7.5)	7.28.0	`3805b8f8`
GHSA-pr7r-676h-xcf6	CVE-2026-9678	Moderate (5.9)	7.28.0	`85a24055`
GHSA-p88m-4jfj-68fv	CVE-2026-9679	Moderate (5.9)	7.28.0	`d0574cc4`
GHSA-g8m3-5g58-fq7m	CVE-2026-11525	Low (3.7)	7.28.0	`d0574cc4`
GHSA-35p6-xmwp-9g52	CVE-2026-6733	Low (3.7)	7.28.0	`ea8930cf`

High severity

WebSocket DoS via fragment count bypass — CVE-2026-12151

GHSA-vxpw-j846-p89q · CWE-400, CWE-770
Fix: 8cb10f98 websocket: limit the number of fragments in a message (part of backport a027a4a0 Backport WebSocket maxPayloadSize fixes to v7.x, #5423)

A malicious WebSocket server can stream a large number of small or empty
continuation frames. Undici enforced a limit on cumulative payload size but did
not limit the number of fragments per message, leading to unbounded memory
growth and denial of service.

Affected: applications using new WebSocket(...) or WebSocketStream
against untrusted endpoints.
Workaround: none — upgrade is required.

TLS certificate validation bypass in SOCKS5 ProxyAgent — CVE-2026-9697

GHSA-vmh5-mc38-953g · CWE-295
Fix: 04201f89 fix: honor requestTls when proxy is SOCKS5 (#5417)

The ProxyAgent silently discarded the requestTls option when configured with
a SOCKS5 proxy. TLS connections through the SOCKS5 tunnel ignored user-configured
parameters such as ca, cert, key, rejectUnauthorized, and servername,
falling back to the default Mozilla CA bundle. Applications relying on
certificate pinning to an internal CA were exposed to man-in-the-middle attacks.

Affected: ProxyAgent / Socks5ProxyAgent over SOCKS5 that rely on
requestTls.
Workaround: route traffic through an HTTP-proxy ProxyAgent, where
requestTls functions correctly.

Cross-origin request routing via SOCKS5 proxy pool reuse — CVE-2026-6734

GHSA-hm92-r4w5-c3mj · CWE-346
Fix: 3805b8f8 fix(socks5-proxy-agent): use per-origin pools to prevent cross-origin routing (#5041)

Socks5ProxyAgent reused a single connection pool across different origins
without verifying the pool's origin matched the requested origin. This could
route credentials and request data to unintended destinations, cause responses
from the wrong origin to be trusted, and enable HTTPS→

❗ Important

✂ PR body was truncated to here.

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

Branch creation
- At any time (no schedule defined)
Automerge
- At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

vercel · 2026-06-20T15:48:48Z

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated
connect	Ready	Preview	Sep 11, 2026 2:27pm UTC

coderabbitai · 2026-09-11T14:25:45Z

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: 2b9e3916-cb11-4712-b7cc-70e7c933b36d

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

🔍 Trigger review

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – connect June 20, 2026 15:50 View deployment

renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-undici-vulnerability branch from df3534f to 420eb78 Compare August 7, 2026 03:53

renovate Bot changed the title ~~Update dependency undici to v7.28.0 [SECURITY]~~ Update dependency undici to v7.29.0 [SECURITY] Aug 7, 2026

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – connect August 7, 2026 03:55 View deployment

Update dependency undici to v7.29.0 [SECURITY]

de7d904

renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-undici-vulnerability branch from 420eb78 to de7d904 Compare September 11, 2026 14:25

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – connect September 11, 2026 14:27 View deployment

Navigation Menu

Uh oh!

Update dependency undici to v7.29.0 [SECURITY] - #62

Update dependency undici to v7.29.0 [SECURITY]#62
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/npm-undici-vulnerability

renovate Bot commented Jun 20, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

vercel Bot commented Jun 20, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 11, 2026

Review skipped

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

0 participants

Uh oh!

Conversation

renovate Bot commented Jun 20, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Undici proxy-authorization header not cleared on cross-origin redirect in fetch

Details

Impact

Patches

Workarounds

References

Severity

References

Undici's Proxy-Authorization header not cleared on cross-origin redirect for dispatch, request, stream, pipeline

Details

Impact

Patches

Workarounds

References

Severity

References

Undici's fetch with integrity option is too lax when algorithm is specified but hash value is in incorrect

Details

Impact

Patches

Workarounds

References

Severity

References

Use of Insufficiently Random Values in undici

Details

Impact

Patches

Workarounds

References

Severity

References

undici Denial of Service attack via bad certificate data

Details

Impact

Patches

Workarounds

References

Severity

References

Undici has an HTTP Request/Response Smuggling issue

Details

Impact

Patches

Workarounds

Severity

References

Undici has CRLF Injection in undici via upgrade option

Details

Impact

Patches

Workarounds

Severity

References

undici vulnerable to TLS certificate validation bypass via dropped requestTls in SOCKS5 ProxyAgent

Details

Impact

Patches

Workarounds

Severity

References

undici vulnerable to cross-user information disclosure via shared cache whitespace bypass

Details

Impact

Patches

Workarounds

Severity

References

undici vulnerable to cross-origin request routing via SOCKS5 proxy pool reuse

Details

Impact

Patches

Workarounds

Severity

References

undici vulnerable to HTTP response queue poisoning via keep-alive socket reuse

renovate Bot commented Jun 20, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Undici has CRLF Injection in undici via `upgrade` option

`v7.29.0`

`v7.28.0`