Correct local model memory evidence#4
Draft
alan-d-smith wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
max,oom,oom_kill, and related v2/v1 evidence) in llama.cpp smoke and local-route benchmark outputs.memory.maxis pressure/reclaim evidence, not an automatic OOM failure.Why
The previous decision treated a cgroup peak equal to the configured ceiling as proof that a model could not run. That conclusion was not in the participant guide and did not distinguish reclaim/limit-hit events from actual OOM or OOM-kill events. The corrected run produced all 40 answers with zero OOMs and zero OOM kills.
Impact
The scored runtime and published image are unchanged. No GGUF weight or llama.cpp runtime dependency is shipped by this PR. Future local-model decisions now carry explicit memory-pressure evidence, and Phi-4 Mini Q4_K_S remains eligible for a separate exact baked-image experiment.
Validation