BE-524: HashQL: Remove island schedule module by indietyp · Pull Request #8694 · hashintel/hash

indietyp · 2026-05-04T10:40:00Z

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

The island::schedule module, which provided topological scheduling with parallelism level assignment for execution islands, has been removed. This includes the IslandSchedule and ScheduledIsland types, the schedule and schedule_in methods on IslandGraph, and all associated tests. The scheduling functionality is no longer needed or has been superseded by an alternative approach.

🔍 What does this change?

Removes the schedule submodule from island/mod.rs
Deletes island/schedule/mod.rs, which contained the IslandSchedule and ScheduledIsland types along with the Kahn's algorithm-based topological level assignment implementation
Deletes island/schedule/tests.rs, which contained tests for level ordering, contiguity, and full node coverage of the schedule
Removes the public re-exports of IslandSchedule and ScheduledIsland from pass/execution/mod.rs

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

This PR:

does not modify any publishable blocks or libraries, or modifications do not need publishing

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

The changes in this PR:

are internal and do not require a docs change

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

The changes in this PR:

do not affect the execution graph

🛡 What tests cover this?

The tests that previously covered the scheduling logic have been removed alongside the implementation.

❓ How to test this?

Checkout the branch
Run cargo test in libs/@local/hashql/mir
Confirm that the build succeeds and no references to IslandSchedule or ScheduledIsland remain

vercel · 2026-05-04T10:40:04Z

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Error		May 11, 2026 11:02am
petrinaut	Ready	Preview	May 11, 2026 11:02am

1 Skipped Deployment

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ignored	Preview	May 11, 2026 11:02am

cursor · 2026-05-04T10:40:07Z

PR Summary

Low Risk
Low risk internal cleanup: the island scheduling implementation and its tests are removed, and no remaining in-repo references were found, but any out-of-crate consumers of the removed re-exports would need updates.

Overview
Removes the island::schedule module, deleting the IslandGraph::schedule/schedule_in topological-level scheduling implementation and all associated unit tests.

Stops re-exporting IslandSchedule and ScheduledIsland from pass::execution, leaving island construction/graphing intact but without the dedicated scheduling API.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 2ae4ba3. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

indietyp · 2026-05-04T10:40:40Z

Warning

This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack on Graphite.
Learn more

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

augmentcode · 2026-05-04T10:41:19Z

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: Removes the deprecated/unused HashQL MIR island scheduling implementation and its public surface area.

Changes:

Drops the pass::execution::island::schedule submodule from island/mod.rs
Deletes the scheduling implementation (IslandGraph::schedule/schedule_in) and the related types (IslandSchedule, ScheduledIsland)
Removes the schedule unit tests that validated ordering/level semantics
Removes the re-exports of IslandSchedule/ScheduledIsland from pass::execution

Technical Notes: This PR is primarily an API/code deletion; downstream code must no longer rely on the removed scheduling helpers and should use the newer/superseding execution approach instead.

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

augmentcode

Review completed. No suggestions at this time.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

codspeed-hq · 2026-05-04T10:46:00Z

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 24 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 56 skipped benchmarks¹

_{Comparing bm/be-524-hashql-remove-island-dag (2ae4ba3) with bm/be-525-hashql-remove-implicit-type-widening-into-num-for-int (b87ca3d)²}

56 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩
No successful run was found on bm/be-525-hashql-remove-implicit-type-widening-into-num-for-int (b63a08d) during the generation of this report, so 2d938d2 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

codecov · 2026-05-04T11:46:22Z

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 66.69%. Comparing base (b63a08d) to head (2ae4ba3).

Additional details and impacted files

@@                                         Coverage Diff                                         @@
##           bm/be-525-hashql-remove-implicit-type-widening-into-num-for-int    #8694      +/-   ##
===================================================================================================
+ Coverage                                                            58.98%   66.69%   +7.71%     
===================================================================================================
  Files                                                                  709      889     +180     
  Lines                                                                51724    83632   +31908     
  Branches                                                              3743     4365     +622     
===================================================================================================
+ Hits                                                                 30509    55780   +25271     
- Misses                                                               20905    27322    +6417     
- Partials                                                               310      530     +220

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	`1.41% <ø> (ø)`
apps.hash-api	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-backend-utils	`2.81% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-graph-sdk	`9.63% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-api	`2.52% <ø> (?)`
rust.hashql-compiletest	`28.26% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-eval	`79.70% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-mir	`91.84% <ø> (?)`

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

github-actions · 2026-05-04T13:03:32Z

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$27.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 178 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.622 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.41 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.973 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$12.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 93.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.017 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$43.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 317 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.97 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$14.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 98.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.014 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$24.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 195 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.639 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$28.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 170 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.047 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.73 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.456 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$13.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 105 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.773 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.76 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.137 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.96 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.827 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.33 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.075 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.14 \mathrm{ms} \pm 37.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.210 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.52 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.719 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$4.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 30.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.584 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.45 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.159 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.47 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.789 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.13 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.907 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.62 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.025 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.52 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.856 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.59 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.187 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.85 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.344 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.66 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.542 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.86 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.826 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.05 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.197 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.76 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.816 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$3.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.312 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.49 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.27 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.01 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.230 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.505 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.39 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.991 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.428 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.106 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$54.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 312 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.040 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$46.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 184 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.727 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$50.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 273 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.316 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$44.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 220 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.045 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$63.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 367 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.580 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$61.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 303 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.864 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$56.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 347 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.303 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$104 \mathrm{ms} \pm 486 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.340 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$46.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 237 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.427 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$325 \mathrm{ms} \pm 803 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.23 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$19.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 109 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.018 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$20.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 118 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.69 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$20.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 121 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.504 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$19.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 105 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.205 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$25.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 109 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.623 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$19.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 132 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.719 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$19.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 121 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.968 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$20.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 99.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.849 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$20.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 110 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.576 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$26.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 197 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.748 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1`	$$35.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 312 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.116 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1`	$$36.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 298 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.236 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1`	$$34.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 387 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.088 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1`	$$33.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 302 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.939 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2`	$$35.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 312 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.210 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1`	$$35.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 284 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.268 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1`	$$35.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 268 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.861 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1`	$$35.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 275 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.655 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1`	$$35.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 294 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.119 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: `bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba`	$$8.66 \mathrm{ms} \pm 51.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.044 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$92.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 558 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.231 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$148 \mathrm{ms} \pm 549 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.203 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$99.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 508 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.176 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$113 \mathrm{ms} \pm 618 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.971 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$119 \mathrm{ms} \pm 533 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.197 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$127 \mathrm{ms} \pm 481 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.758 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$103 \mathrm{ms} \pm 511 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.341 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$133 \mathrm{ms} \pm 663 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.253 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$110 \mathrm{ms} \pm 524 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.021 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$119 \mathrm{ms} \pm 619 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.629 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$121 \mathrm{ms} \pm 579 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.861 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$121 \mathrm{ms} \pm 540 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.833 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$183 \mathrm{ms} \pm 830 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}33.9 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$169 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.47 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}15.1 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$40.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 234 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.118 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$554 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.33 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-2.201 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

feat: remove schedule island

2ae4ba3

vercel Bot temporarily deployed to Preview – petrinaut May 4, 2026 10:40 Inactive

graphite-app Bot assigned indietyp May 4, 2026

github-actions Bot added area/libs Relates to first-party libraries/crates/packages (area) type/eng > backend Owned by the @backend team labels May 4, 2026

indietyp mentioned this pull request May 4, 2026

BE-525: HashQL: Remove implicit type-widening from Integer operations, and make comparison size aware #8693

Open

3 tasks

augmentcode Bot reviewed May 4, 2026

View reviewed changes

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash May 4, 2026 10:47 View deployment

indietyp force-pushed the bm/be-525-hashql-remove-implicit-type-widening-into-num-for-int branch from 07de63c to b87ca3d Compare May 4, 2026 11:34

indietyp force-pushed the bm/be-524-hashql-remove-island-dag branch from c7079f9 to 6e14a48 Compare May 4, 2026 11:34

vercel Bot temporarily deployed to Preview – petrinaut May 4, 2026 11:35 Inactive

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash May 4, 2026 11:47 View deployment

indietyp mentioned this pull request May 4, 2026

BE-512: HashQL: Allow cross-backend transitions for SwitchInt terminators #8696

Open

3 tasks

indietyp mentioned this pull request May 4, 2026

BE-513: HashQL: Rework dynamic aggregate size estimation #8697

Open

indietyp force-pushed the bm/be-524-hashql-remove-island-dag branch from 6e14a48 to 55f11e3 Compare May 8, 2026 08:33

indietyp force-pushed the bm/be-525-hashql-remove-implicit-type-widening-into-num-for-int branch from b87ca3d to 1d64eff Compare May 8, 2026 08:33

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut May 8, 2026 08:37 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash May 8, 2026 08:46 View deployment

indietyp force-pushed the bm/be-525-hashql-remove-implicit-type-widening-into-num-for-int branch from 1d64eff to b63a08d Compare May 11, 2026 10:58

indietyp force-pushed the bm/be-524-hashql-remove-island-dag branch from 55f11e3 to 2ae4ba3 Compare May 11, 2026 10:58

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut May 11, 2026 11:01 View deployment

vercel Bot had a problem deploying to Preview – hash May 11, 2026 11:02 Failure

Conversation

indietyp commented May 4, 2026

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

🔍 What does this change?

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

🛡 What tests cover this?

❓ How to test this?

Uh oh!

vercel Bot commented May 4, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

cursor Bot commented May 4, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Summary

Uh oh!

indietyp commented May 4, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

augmentcode Bot commented May 4, 2026

Uh oh!

augmentcode Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codspeed-hq Bot commented May 4, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Merging this PR will not alter performance

Footnotes

Uh oh!

codecov Bot commented May 4, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented May 4, 2026

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

1 participant

vercel Bot commented May 4, 2026 •

edited

Loading

cursor Bot commented May 4, 2026 •

edited

Loading

indietyp commented May 4, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codspeed-hq Bot commented May 4, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codecov Bot commented May 4, 2026 •

edited

Loading