This repository was archived by the owner on Dec 5, 2024. It is now read-only.
Cleanup code#64
Open
tylervz wants to merge 3 commits into
Open
Conversation
|
why the explicit return statement change? |
Author
It’s just a stylistic preference. I think it makes the code easier to read. But I can take them out if most people prefer implicit returns. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add an
.editorconfigfile, add final newlines to many files, convert tabs to spaces in some Groovy files, make the indentation consistent across files.Change implicit return statements in Groovy code to be explicit return statements.