Skip to content

Update dependency-check workflow to v4 - #239

Merged
infeo merged 1 commit into
developfrom
copilot/check-repo-affect
Oct 12, 2026
Merged

infeo merged 1 commit into
developfrom
copilot/check-repo-affect

Conversation

Copilot AI commented Oct 12, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The dependency-check workflow used the older reusable workflow version and included a Slack webhook secret input. This updates it to match the referenced change.

  • Workflow: Pin run-dependency-check.yml to v4.0.0.
  • Secrets: Remove the obsolete Slack webhook input.

Co-authored-by: infeo <9036915+infeo@users.noreply.github.com>
@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI requested a review from infeo October 12, 2026 14:22
@infeo
infeo marked this pull request as ready for review October 12, 2026 14:30
Copilot AI balanced review requested due to automatic review settings October 12, 2026 14:30

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟢 Approval recommended

The pinned commit matches v4.0.0 and all configured inputs and secrets match its interface.

0 open findings

What changed in this PR

Updates the dependency-check workflow to the v4 reusable workflow contract.

Changes:

  • Pins the workflow to verified v4.0.0 commit.
  • Removes the obsolete Slack webhook secret.
File Description
.github/​workflows/​dependency-check.yml Updates workflow reference and secrets.

🧠 Review effort: Balanced


💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.

@infeo
infeo merged commit afa59cb into develop Oct 12, 2026
12 checks passed
@infeo
infeo deleted the copilot/check-repo-affect branch October 12, 2026 14:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants