Simplify conformance and example maintenance with adapterctl - #439
Draft
alexolivier wants to merge 4 commits into
Draft
Simplify conformance and example maintenance with adapterctl#439alexolivier wants to merge 4 commits into
alexolivier wants to merge 4 commits into
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Alex Olivier <alex@alexolivier.me>
Signed-off-by: Alex Olivier <alex@alexolivier.me>
Signed-off-by: Alex Olivier <alex@alexolivier.me>
Signed-off-by: Alex Olivier <alex@alexolivier.me>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Problem / Intent
Conformance actions, adapter classifications, consumer expectations, workflow coverage, and corpus counts are currently repeated across root ledgers, native harnesses, and documentation. That makes adding one action, adapter, or consumer case a repository-wide synchronization exercise and leaves several ways for declared support to drift from executed coverage.
Closes #434.
Approach
adapterctlcontrol plane with meaningful Ink views, versioned TypeBox schemas, strict and discovery validation, direct adapter outcomes, native run profiles, reports, explanations, scaffolding, and generated certification docs.conformance/catalog.json, canonical check resources,demo/cases.json, and 11 adapter-local manifests the only certification inputs; migrate every native harness and example to consume them directly.conformance/actions.json,demo/expected.json, compatibility comparison code, repeated action counts, and the migration flag. This is an intentional repository-internal breaking cutover rather than a compatibility transition.All 11 adapters are affected. Verification includes adapterctl type-checking and 41 public-interface tests, strict 199-action × 11-adapter certification with zero unassessed outcomes, schema/docs/corpus/demo validators, workflow YAML and control-plane JSON parsing, full offline TypeScript translator suites, focused discovery tests in every language, Go offline suites/examples, packed consumer builds, Ruby/Python syntax and loader checks, and Java focused/direct compilation checks. Docker-backed semantic matrices remain covered by their adapter-owned CI workflows.