Kubernetes Pod Operator: handle unknown pod phase#65202
Merged
jscheffl merged 2 commits intoapache:mainfrom Apr 14, 2026
Merged
Kubernetes Pod Operator: handle unknown pod phase#65202jscheffl merged 2 commits intoapache:mainfrom
jscheffl merged 2 commits intoapache:mainfrom
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
I think the 403 error from the logs is irrelevant to the provider, just a missing permission in astronomer. |
Nataneljpwd
approved these changes
Apr 14, 2026
Contributor
Nataneljpwd
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good! This still allowes the pod to recover if the node comes back which is great!
jscheffl
approved these changes
Apr 14, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We had a recent task failure which we were only alerted on once we hit the dagrun timeout. The logs looked like
Most notably are the lines
{pod_manager.py:150} ▲▲▲ Log group endwhich indicate that the state of the pod was at least not pending when it reached this. Given the other phases the pod could have been in, I believe the most likely situation is that there was a node communication issue and that the pod phase was unknown. That this allows us to break out of theawait_pod_startloop feels incorrect. I think it should remain in the loop and be allowed to hit the scheduled timeout, same as if it was stuck in pending.