SME review: scope check for 16.0 Agama docs - #764
Open
sounix000 wants to merge 4 commits into
Open
Conversation
* agama: remove unsupported options in SLE 16.0 * agama: remove unsupported AutoYaST options in SLE 16.0
ancorgs
reviewed
Aug 25, 2026
| </listitem> | ||
| <listitem> | ||
| <para> | ||
| Additional storage search conditions—file system type or label, partition |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Those changes are introduced for SLE-16.1. Those additional search conditions are not available in SLE-16.0.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
And indeed I don't think this PR adds the documentation about those options. So maybe this is a mistake just in the asm file.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR creator: Description
SME review: scope check for 16.0 Agama docs.
PR creator: Are there any relevant issues/feature requests?
PR reviewer: Checklist for editorial review
Apart from the usual checks, please double-check also the following: