[hugrbot]

Automated release PR.

Remove the X-regen-changelog label to take manual control of the changelogs.

📝 Release notes preview

Extracted verbatim from the committed changelogs. This is exactly what will be published to the GitHub releases.

guppylang 1.2.1

Bug Fixes

• Raise minimum tket version to 0.15.15 (fix: Raise minimum tket version to 0.15.15  #2526)(cf2336b)
• Ignore docstrings in guppy.unitary classes (fix: Ignore docstrings in guppy.unitary classes #2524)(425437c)
• Reject whole-value uses of mixed quantum/classical structs and tuples under dagger (fix: Reject whole-value uses of mixed quantum/classical structs and tuples under dagger #2523)(02544e0)
• Fix linearity checking of struct and tuple fields in control blocks (fix: Fix linearity checking of struct and tuple fields in control blocks #2510)(d4870c4)
• Detect qubits in struct and enum fields when checking control constraints (fix: Detect qubits in struct and enum fields #2509)(74ea66a)

Code Refactoring

• Decouple selene dependencies from guppylang compiler (refactor: Decouple selene dependencies from guppylang compiler #2498)(3476258)

guppylang-internals 1.2.1

Bug Fixes

• Raise minimum tket version to 0.15.15 (fix: Raise minimum tket version to 0.15.15  #2526)(cf2336b)
• Ignore docstrings in guppy.unitary classes (fix: Ignore docstrings in guppy.unitary classes #2524)(425437c)
• Reject whole-value uses of mixed quantum/classical structs and tuples under dagger (fix: Reject whole-value uses of mixed quantum/classical structs and tuples under dagger #2523)(02544e0)
• Fix linearity checking of struct and tuple fields in control blocks (fix: Fix linearity checking of struct and tuple fields in control blocks #2510)(d4870c4)
• Detect qubits in struct and enum fields when checking control constraints (fix: Detect qubits in struct and enum fields #2509)(74ea66a)

[mauriziocolosimo-qtm]

✅ Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

Status	Scan Engine	Critical	High	Medium	Low	Total (0)
🔚	Open Source Security	0	0	0	0	0 issues

💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse.

[github-actions]

Bencher Report

Project	guppylang
Branch	release-pr--release/1.2
Testbed	Linux

🚨 8 Alerts

Benchmark	Measure Units	View	Benchmark Result (Result Δ%)	Upper Boundary (Limit %)
tests/benchmarks/test_big_array.py::test_big_array_compile	hugr_nodes nodes x 1e3	📈 plot 🚷 threshold 🚨 alert (🔔)	4.58 x 1e3 (+1.57%) Baseline: 4.51 x 1e3	4.56 x 1e3 (100.57%)
tests/benchmarks/test_big_array.py::test_big_array_compile	hugr_bytes bytes x 1e3	📈 plot 🚷 threshold 🚨 alert (🔔)	62.22 x 1e3 (+3.98%) Baseline: 59.84 x 1e3	60.44 x 1e3 (102.95%)
tests/benchmarks/test_ctrl_flow.py::test_many_ctrl_flow_compile	hugr_bytes bytes x 1e3	📈 plot 🚷 threshold 🚨 alert (🔔)	28.17 x 1e3 (+4.83%) Baseline: 26.87 x 1e3	27.14 x 1e3 (103.80%)
tests/benchmarks/test_ctrl_flow.py::test_many_ctrl_flow_compile	hugr_nodes nodes x 1e3	📈 plot 🚷 threshold 🚨 alert (🔔)	1.30 x 1e3 (+10.07%) Baseline: 1.18 x 1e3	1.19 x 1e3 (108.98%)
tests/benchmarks/test_queue_push_pop.py::test_queue_push_benchmark_compile	hugr_nodes nodes	📈 plot 🚷 threshold 🚨 alert (🔔)	303.00 (+8.60%) Baseline: 279.00	281.79 (107.53%)
tests/benchmarks/test_queue_push_pop.py::test_queue_push_benchmark_compile	hugr_bytes bytes x 1e3	📈 plot 🚷 threshold 🚨 alert (🔔)	6.86 x 1e3 (+2.33%) Baseline: 6.70 x 1e3	6.77 x 1e3 (101.32%)
tests/benchmarks/test_queue_push_pop.py::test_queue_push_pop_benchmark_compile	hugr_nodes nodes	📈 plot 🚷 threshold 🚨 alert (🔔)	404.00 (+8.89%) Baseline: 371.00	374.71 (107.82%)
tests/benchmarks/test_queue_push_pop.py::test_queue_push_pop_benchmark_compile	hugr_bytes bytes x 1e3	📈 plot 🚷 threshold 🚨 alert (🔔)	9.47 x 1e3 (+2.71%) Baseline: 9.22 x 1e3	9.31 x 1e3 (101.70%)

Click to view all benchmark results

Benchmark	hugr_bytes	Benchmark Result bytes x 1e3 (Result Δ%)	Upper Boundary bytes x 1e3 (Limit %)	hugr_nodes	Benchmark Result nodes (Result Δ%)	Upper Boundary nodes (Limit %)
tests/benchmarks/test_big_array.py::test_big_array_compile	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold 🚨 view alert (🔔)	62.22 x 1e3 (+3.98%) Baseline: 59.84 x 1e3	60.44 x 1e3 (102.95%)	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold 🚨 view alert (🔔)	4,585.00 (+1.57%) Baseline: 4,514.00	4,559.14 (100.57%)
tests/benchmarks/test_ctrl_flow.py::test_many_ctrl_flow_compile	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold 🚨 view alert (🔔)	28.17 x 1e3 (+4.83%) Baseline: 26.87 x 1e3	27.14 x 1e3 (103.80%)	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold 🚨 view alert (🔔)	1,301.00 (+10.07%) Baseline: 1,182.00	1,193.82 (108.98%)
tests/benchmarks/test_queue_push_pop.py::test_queue_push_benchmark_compile	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold 🚨 view alert (🔔)	6.86 x 1e3 (+2.33%) Baseline: 6.70 x 1e3	6.77 x 1e3 (101.32%)	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold 🚨 view alert (🔔)	303.00 (+8.60%) Baseline: 279.00	281.79 (107.53%)
tests/benchmarks/test_queue_push_pop.py::test_queue_push_pop_benchmark_compile	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold 🚨 view alert (🔔)	9.47 x 1e3 (+2.71%) Baseline: 9.22 x 1e3	9.31 x 1e3 (101.70%)	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold 🚨 view alert (🔔)	404.00 (+8.89%) Baseline: 371.00	374.71 (107.82%)

🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 93.49%. Comparing base (cf2336b) to head (a12cfaf).

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##           release/1.2    #2499   +/-   ##
============================================
  Coverage        93.49%   93.49%           
============================================
  Files              167      167           
  Lines            16916    16916           
============================================
  Hits             15816    15816           
  Misses            1100     1100           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[maximilianruesch]

We can ignore the highest release compatibility failure as of #2452 (comment)