Add BIPs project page - #912
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
| mailing list discussions and design sketches into stable documents that can be | ||
| reviewed, referenced, implemented, tested, and challenged over time. | ||
|
|
||
| That work is mostly coordination and maintenance. Authors have to define scope, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review, particularly of technical soundness and completeness, is the most time-consuming (and critical) aspect.
It has become a larger part of the BIP maintainership process, as we receive more and more LLM-generated submissions that are now trivial for authors to make but don't always make technical or conceptual sense and that (too often) skip the required mail list discussion step.
Also, moderation is an (annoying) aspect that can at times be time-consuming.
Scope discussions can also be long. The Ordinals BIP draft, for instance.
In summary, the role is called Editor, but in reality is maintainership, technical review, editor, scope and soundness guardian, and moderator.
|
Approach ACK ❤️ I suppose adding it to the Projects page list would be in a follow-up PR. |
Arvin21M
left a comment
Arvin21M
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maybe we can use something like this for the icon instead?
Co-authored-by: Jon Atack <jon@atack.com>
3 participants
Adds Bitcoin Improvement Proposals to the public project directory with a concise overview of the BIP process, the BIP 3 process refresh, and OpenSats support for Jon Atack's BIP review and maintenance work. I left
totalSatsSentunset because the project page does not map cleanly to a single public payout stream./projects/bipsMDX pagebips.dev, BIP 3, and the Jon Atack LTS announcementBuild preview:
Fixes OpenSats/content#297