Fix missing entry in RC to randinf and new identity pattern to make future misses more obvious - #7141
Open
Pepper0ni wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Fix missing entry in RC to randinf and new identity pattern to make future misses more obvious#7141Pepper0ni wants to merge 1 commit into
Pepper0ni wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
…uture misses more obvious
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This address the twinrova spawning in the crawlspace boulder issue by adding the RC to the RC to randinf table. it being a [] operator caused it to be filled with a default value, which was later read as junk data which lined up to twinrova.
I also added a new pattern to the various "identify" functions which will identify missed entries in future by asserting if it ever encounters a missing entry in rcToRandomizerInf.
Build Artifacts