Skip to content

Merge main into feat/add-t0 (resolve uv.lock conflict)#1

Merged
GeoffNN merged 6 commits into
GeoffNN:feat/add-t0from
huikan-tfc:resolve-uvlock-merge-main
Jun 16, 2026
Merged

Merge main into feat/add-t0 (resolve uv.lock conflict)#1
GeoffNN merged 6 commits into
GeoffNN:feat/add-t0from
huikan-tfc:resolve-uvlock-merge-main

Conversation

@huikan-tfc

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Merges the current TimeCopilot/timecopilot main into this branch to clear the uv.lock conflict blocking TimeCopilot#348.

What conflicted

Only uv.lock. pyproject.toml and tirex.py auto-merged cleanly. The conflict came from main's tirex bump (TimeCopilot#346), which changed the resolution (timecopilot-tirex>=0.1.1 unconditional, torchvision dropped, xlstm added) while this branch independently added tfc-t0.

Resolution

Union of both sides: main's resolution plus this branch's tfc-t0. To avoid a ~6,600-line reformat (the committed lock uses an older uv serialization that current uv rewrites wholesale), tfc-t0 was grafted onto main's lock in the existing compact format — a clean +21-line diff (one [[package]] block + 2 dependency references).

Verification

  • Parsed the resolved lock and a full uv lock regeneration as TOML → content-identical.
  • uvx uv@latest lock --checkexit 0 (lock is up-to-date; CI won't re-resolve).
  • No conflict markers remain.

Merging this PR into feat/add-t0 makes TimeCopilot#348 mergeable into main again.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

AzulGarza and others added 6 commits June 9, 2026 16:26
Resolve uv.lock conflict by taking main's resolution (tirex>=0.1.1 bump,
torchvision dropped, xlstm added) plus this branch's tfc-t0 addition.
Verified content-identical to a full `uv lock` regeneration; `uv lock --check`
passes.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@GeoffNN GeoffNN merged commit 659464f into GeoffNN:feat/add-t0 Jun 16, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants