Skip to content

Ispyb integration vmxm grid scan#1653

Merged
rtuck99 merged 55 commits into
mainfrom
ispyb_integration_vmxm_grid_scan
May 15, 2026
Merged

Ispyb integration vmxm grid scan#1653
rtuck99 merged 55 commits into
mainfrom
ispyb_integration_vmxm_grid_scan

Conversation

@olliesilvester
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@olliesilvester olliesilvester commented Mar 3, 2026

Add ispyb integration for vmxm grid scans

Requires

Also requires additional changes from beamline hotfixes

Instructions to reviewer on how to test:

  1. Do thing x
  2. Confirm thing y happens

Checks for reviewer

  • Would the PR title make sense to a user on a set of release notes

@olliesilvester olliesilvester requested a review from a team as a code owner March 3, 2026 09:05
@olliesilvester olliesilvester force-pushed the ispyb_integration_vmxm_grid_scan branch from 44e7612 to 2a3e3f2 Compare March 10, 2026 17:08
@rtuck99 rtuck99 mentioned this pull request May 5, 2026
@rtuck99 rtuck99 self-assigned this May 5, 2026
Base automatically changed from add_vmxm_gridscan_plan to main May 13, 2026 12:56

# We should improve slit PV name to give consistency, or come up with a way
# to get better typing on the _data dict
if _data["s4_slit_gaps-xgap"]:
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is already an mx-bluesky issue to end this madness:

@rtuck99 rtuck99 self-requested a review May 15, 2026 10:55
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@rtuck99 rtuck99 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved

@rtuck99 rtuck99 merged commit e34b6cf into main May 15, 2026
15 checks passed
@rtuck99 rtuck99 deleted the ispyb_integration_vmxm_grid_scan branch May 15, 2026 10:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants