What problem would the feature you're requesting solve? Please describe.
The artifact-publishing work in #11986 and #12027 is deliberately limited to producing the standalone Linux Host and WorkerProxy artifacts. Automated process/container smoke coverage should be a separate follow-up rather than a BYOC-M1 publishing requirement.
The smoke tests should exercise the artifacts consumed by image builders, not rebuild the products through an unrelated path or treat a listener health response as proof that functions can execute.
Describe the solution you'd like
Add focused smoke coverage for the published Linux x64/Noble artifacts:
- Consume
functions-host.linux-x64.tar.gz and worker-proxy.linux-x64.tar.gz, preserving executable permissions and using the documented entrypoints and runtime dependencies.
- Start the dedicated
Azure.Functions.Host with zero workers and confirm its HTTP listener is healthy while distinguishing that from function invocation readiness.
- Start Native AOT
Azure.Functions.WorkerProxy without a managed .NET runtime and confirm its management endpoint is available.
- For a linked HTTP smoke, launch one separately supplied .NET isolated test worker in the proxy's network namespace, configure the reachable proxy HTTP origin, link through
PUT /admin/workers, then invoke the Host's sample HTTP function and assert the expected response.
- Require bounded startup, request, and shutdown waits. Send SIGTERM and verify clean process/container exits; retain useful logs on failure and clean up only test-owned resources.
- Keep test configuration and network exposure isolated. Verify existing supported behavior without adding new product configuration requirements, readiness APIs, or runtime behavior changes solely for the tests.
Acceptance criteria:
- Smoke tests run against the produced artifacts/images, with no alternate product publish path.
- Host/proxy listener health, actual linked-worker invocation, and graceful shutdown are reported as distinct outcomes.
- Failures produce actionable diagnostics, return a nonzero result, and do not leave test-owned processes or containers running.
- Existing standard Host behavior and its pipeline tests remain unchanged.
Scheduling: leave this issue without a milestone for now. Assign it to a future milestone when the smoke work is scheduled; it is not a blocker for #11986, #12027, or BYOC-M1 artifact publishing.
Out of scope: bundle-cache/fallback testing (covered elsewhere), a bespoke artifact-verifier framework, additional language/OS matrices, production authentication changes, registry publication, rollout/pool orchestration, or a bundled worker/supervisor product.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Keeping this coverage in the artifact-publishing PR was rejected to keep that change focused. Existing unit tests remain valuable, but they do not replace a future smoke against the actual published binaries and their container/runtime dependencies.
Additional context
What problem would the feature you're requesting solve? Please describe.
The artifact-publishing work in #11986 and #12027 is deliberately limited to producing the standalone Linux Host and WorkerProxy artifacts. Automated process/container smoke coverage should be a separate follow-up rather than a BYOC-M1 publishing requirement.
The smoke tests should exercise the artifacts consumed by image builders, not rebuild the products through an unrelated path or treat a listener health response as proof that functions can execute.
Describe the solution you'd like
Add focused smoke coverage for the published Linux x64/Noble artifacts:
functions-host.linux-x64.tar.gzandworker-proxy.linux-x64.tar.gz, preserving executable permissions and using the documented entrypoints and runtime dependencies.Azure.Functions.Hostwith zero workers and confirm its HTTP listener is healthy while distinguishing that from function invocation readiness.Azure.Functions.WorkerProxywithout a managed .NET runtime and confirm its management endpoint is available.PUT /admin/workers, then invoke the Host's sample HTTP function and assert the expected response.Acceptance criteria:
Scheduling: leave this issue without a milestone for now. Assign it to a future milestone when the smoke work is scheduled; it is not a blocker for #11986, #12027, or BYOC-M1 artifact publishing.
Out of scope: bundle-cache/fallback testing (covered elsewhere), a bespoke artifact-verifier framework, additional language/OS matrices, production authentication changes, registry publication, rollout/pool orchestration, or a bundled worker/supervisor product.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Keeping this coverage in the artifact-publishing PR was rejected to keep that change focused. Existing unit tests remain valuable, but they do not replace a future smoke against the actual published binaries and their container/runtime dependencies.
Additional context
[Compute Separation][PR-M10+HB4A] Publish the dedicated compute Host artifact.