Fix default orientation and box white balance#268
Conversation
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
❌ Your patch status has failed because the patch coverage (60.00%) is below the target coverage (70.00%). You can increase the patch coverage or adjust the target coverage. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #268 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 91.32% 91.32%
=======================================
Files 17 17
Lines 3551 3551
Branches 527 527
=======================================
Hits 3243 3243
Misses 308 308
Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
Is there a way we can have a regression tests for changed functionality? Also, this feels like a breaking API move basically - changing default behaviour. |
|
I'm not sure there is an easy to test this but will have a look at the test suite. Also yes this changes behaviour, considering these are bug fix so hopefully this is for the better (the greybox white balance was non functional and the orientation from multiple conversion I tested was wrong, though if some are relying on incorrect orientation metadata in the source file, the latter change might be an issue but for the general case I'd think it's something we want). |
|
I'm afraid there is no easy way to test orientations. We don't have any vertical images in the test suite, and ideally we would need multiple. Implementing generation of fake raw test images is on the road map, but until then there is not much we can do. |
|
Ok, I'll leave this here for the time being then, trying to sort out the CLA thing. |
|
Should be signed now, checking if the update will pick it up. |
|
/easycla |
94850a5 to
6d53e76
Compare
|
Hi @remia, how is it going with CLA? I'd like to push out v2.1.1 with the recent DNG bug fixes, would be great to have this one included as well. |
6d53e76 to
5721c7d
Compare
Signed-off-by: Rémi Achard <remiachard@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rémi Achard <remiachard@gmail.com>
5721c7d to
a6efd6c
Compare
|
@antond-weta the CLA was signed last week, unfortunately I don't see any reasons why it fails, "see details" is just a link to the signing page. Wonder if the PR needs to be closed / opened again. Will have a look again tomorrow, sorry about that. |
|
Looks like adding my email to authorised contributors from the company dashboard website was not enough and I also needed to follow the steps in the EasyCLA link, anyway, looks like it's happy now (I tried to update the commits earlier to bump the date in case that was related so had to force push unfortunately). |
…oundation#268) * Fix flip behaviour Signed-off-by: Rémi Achard <remiachard@gmail.com> * Fix wb box Signed-off-by: Rémi Achard <remiachard@gmail.com> --------- Signed-off-by: Rémi Achard <remiachard@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit 6d4276a)
Description
Proposing the follow minor changes:
Tests
Checklist:
need to update the documentation, for example if this is a bug fix that
doesn't change the API.)
(adding new test cases if necessary).
already run clang-format before submitting, I definitely will look at the CI
test that runs clang-format and fix anything that it highlights as being
nonconforming.