Tracking issue for docs/rfc-roadmap-to-1.0.md — merged in #117. Discussion and amendments happen here; the doc is the source of truth and gets updated by PR.
Milestones: v0.7 (script completeness + latency polish: A1 while/until/case/elif, A2 $((...)), B1 prewarm, B2 CLI spawn fallback, C1 differential corpus in CI, C2 locale matrix, D1 harness installers, E1 RFC mini-doc, E2 SECURITY.md) → v0.8 (platform matrix + reach) → v1.0 (stability promise; full criteria in the doc).
Open questions (weigh in):
case fallthrough (;&) — support or loud-reject in A1?
- Should B2's spawn fallback also serve
fauxnix check?
- Is an annotated
fauxnix translate --explain worth it for D3 quickstarts, or scope creep?
- npm co-maintainer — who else wants publish rights?
For wave authors: waves 2–4 (#111, #113/#114, #115) set the pattern — RFC (issue or docs/) → single-commit PRs with tests → integration rule per CONTRIBUTING → maintainer measurement comments. A-track items additionally need a differential corpus case (C1) and README deviations updated.
Tracking issue for docs/rfc-roadmap-to-1.0.md — merged in #117. Discussion and amendments happen here; the doc is the source of truth and gets updated by PR.
Milestones: v0.7 (script completeness + latency polish: A1 while/until/case/elif, A2 $((...)), B1 prewarm, B2 CLI spawn fallback, C1 differential corpus in CI, C2 locale matrix, D1 harness installers, E1 RFC mini-doc, E2 SECURITY.md) → v0.8 (platform matrix + reach) → v1.0 (stability promise; full criteria in the doc).
Open questions (weigh in):
casefallthrough (;&) — support or loud-reject in A1?fauxnix check?fauxnix translate --explainworth it for D3 quickstarts, or scope creep?For wave authors: waves 2–4 (#111, #113/#114, #115) set the pattern — RFC (issue or docs/) → single-commit PRs with tests → integration rule per CONTRIBUTING → maintainer measurement comments. A-track items additionally need a differential corpus case (C1) and README deviations updated.