Skip to content

Commit 277c36d

Browse files
committed
Publish notes Thriving in Complexity, Trond Hjorteland at KanDDDinksy
1 parent 1cb4b98 commit 277c36d

7 files changed

Lines changed: 175 additions & 1 deletion

‎_posts/2026-06-07-beyond-shades-of-conways-law-foundations.md‎

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ layout: article
33
title: "Beyond the Shades of Conway's Law - Foundations: The Origin & The Mirroring Principle"
44
author: Thierry de Pauw
55
category: articles
6-
tags: [ Conway's Law ]
6+
tags: [ Conway's Law, Open Systems Theory ]
77
image: /images/shades-of-conways-law/conways_law_cornet.png
88
---
99

Lines changed: 162 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,162 @@
1+
---
2+
layout: note
3+
title: Thriving in complexity
4+
event:
5+
name: KanDDDinsky
6+
date: 2022-10-31
7+
author:
8+
name: Trond Hjorteland
9+
linkedin: trondhjort
10+
category: notes
11+
tags: [ Complexity, Sociotechnical Systems, Open Systems Theory, KanDDDinsky ]
12+
created_at: 2022-10-31
13+
category: notes
14+
image: /images/kandinsky-thriving-in-complexity-trond-hjorteland/complex-environment-sociotechnical-system.jpg
15+
---
16+
17+
The world around us are getting ever increasingly hard to understand and predict in the way that we are used to. Simply taking a system apart and studying the elements and making useful models out of them seems to fail more often than not. Systems thinking is by many regarded as an essential tool for dealing with this kind of complexity, where unpredictability and ambiguity is the name of the game. The thing is that even though systems thinking is regarded as a new science, it is not an easy task to get a hang of. Not only is it mind-bending and frequently counter-intuitive, there are also numerous different schools of thought that frames things very differently and are useful for different things.
18+
19+
---
20+
21+
the deep, deep rabbit hole that is Systems Thinking
22+
23+
thriving complexity: kids party at home
24+
25+
```plain
26+
kids have the time of their life
27+
but not how you planned it
28+
you are into damage control
29+
```
30+
31+
that's why I started outsourcing this
32+
33+
> A system is never the sum of its parts; its the product of their interactions
34+
>
35+
> -- Russell L. Ackoff
36+
37+
> As system is more than the sum of its parts; it is an indivisible whole.
38+
>
39+
> It loses its essential properties when it is taken apart.
40+
>
41+
> -- Russell L. Ackoff
42+
43+
> An organization is a system and the performance of a system depends more on how its parts interact than on how they act when taken separately.
44+
>
45+
> -- Russell L. Ackoff
46+
47+
=> introduces the soft parts, the social part of socio-technical
48+
49+
Book: Ackoff's Best: His Classic Writing on Management
50+
51+
Types of systems
52+
53+
- deterministic: parts -> no purpose; whole -> no purpose
54+
- animated: parts -> no purpose; whole -> purpose
55+
- social: parts: you are part of a team -> purpose; whole: team -> purpose
56+
- ecological: parts -> purpose; whole -> no purpose
57+
58+
![Sociotechnical Systems Design](/images/kandinsky-thriving-in-complexity-trond-hjorteland/sociotechnical-systems-design.jpg)
59+
60+
this is what defines agile, but in fact this was defined in the 60s
61+
62+
The perfect agile team has been thought of in the social sciences in the 60s
63+
=> Sociotechnical Systems Design
64+
65+
people in an autonomous team have needs, they search for:
66+
67+
- elbow room
68+
- variety
69+
- continual learning
70+
- meaningfulness
71+
- mutual support and respect
72+
- desirable future
73+
74+
again defined by social science in the 60's
75+
76+
Complex Environment - Sociotechnical System
77+
78+
![Complex Environment & Sociotechnical System](/images/kandinsky-thriving-in-complexity-trond-hjorteland/complex-environment-sociotechnical-system.jpg)
79+
<center><i><a href="https://sajie.journals.ac.za/pub/article/view/1144/681">Assessing the impact of new technology on complex sociotechnical systems, Oosthuizen & Pretorius, 2016</a></i></center><br/>
80+
81+
social and technical parts interact
82+
83+
Ackoff -> open systems theory
84+
85+
> The biosphere includes both the individual and the environment, not as interacting parts, not as constituents which have an independent existence, but as aspects of a single reality which can be separated only by abstraction.
86+
>
87+
> -- Andras Angyal, 1941
88+
89+
a system and an environment cannot be separated
90+
91+
=> a system cannot be understood without its environment
92+
93+
=> you are taking away something very important when taking the environment away
94+
95+
the team is exposed to an environment, if you don't know the environment, you cannot understand the team
96+
97+
what we often do is to create a closed system; we do that because it is easier to reason about that
98+
99+
System in two levels of environment
100+
101+
Merrelyn Emery
102+
103+
- the task environment
104+
- the global environment
105+
106+
3 types of systems
107+
108+
- type II: placid clustered: dominant before the industrial revolution
109+
- type III: disturbed reactive: in the industrial area until second world war < 1950
110+
- type IV: turbulent: after world war II > 1950
111+
112+
DP1 and DP2
113+
114+
DP1: redundancy of parts
115+
116+
=> bureaucracy: every part does only one task
117+
118+
=> hierarchy: only the person at the top is responsible, all others are irresponsible
119+
120+
=> Taylorism
121+
122+
DP2: redundancy of functions
123+
124+
every part of the team need to be able to do more than one thing
125+
126+
Merrelyn Emery, The Current Version of Emery's Open Systems Theory
127+
128+
fragility towards resilience
129+
130+
- Type II: placid clustered -> DP2
131+
- Type III: disturbed reactive -> DP1
132+
- Type IV: turbulent -> DP1 -> DP2
133+
134+
=> new DP2
135+
136+
DP1 vs new DP2
137+
138+
DP1: simple org with simple jobs: you don't want to try to change things here -> fragile
139+
140+
new DP2: simple org with complex jobs -> resilient
141+
142+
de Guerre, Open Systems Theory and the Two-Stage Model of Active Adaptation
143+
144+
you have to move from hierarchy of individuals to a hierarchy of functions => no power hierarchy
145+
146+
> STS design was intended to produce a ‘win-win-win-win’: human beings were more committed, technology operated closer to its potential and the organization performed better overall while adapting more readily to change in its environment.
147+
>
148+
> -- Pasmore et al
149+
150+
Emery: www.socialsciencethatactuallyworks.com
151+
152+
> As soon as people are forced to compete, they have to look after their own interests an so self interest comes to dominate life in a DP1 structure. All the team building in the world cannot change this dynamic.
153+
>
154+
> -- Merrelyn Emery
155+
156+
=> competing is not helpful when we are trying to collaborate, we can try to spread knowledge, because now the power is on sharing, not in keeping it.
157+
158+
> It is only when the people involved work out their own design that the necessary motivation, responsibility and commitment to effective implementation is present.
159+
>
160+
> -- Fred Emery & Merrelyn Emery, 1974
161+
162+
=> one does not simply impose designs
163 KB
Loading
122 KB
Loading

‎tags/kandddinsky.html‎

Lines changed: 4 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
1+
---
2+
layout: posts
3+
tag: KanDDDinsky
4+
---

‎tags/open-systems-theory.html‎

Lines changed: 4 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
1+
---
2+
layout: posts
3+
tag: Open Systems Theory
4+
---

‎tags/sociotechnical-systems.html‎

Lines changed: 4 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
1+
---
2+
layout: posts
3+
tag: Sociotechnical Systems
4+
---

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)