BiDi OCPP 1.6J Charging Profiles with negative numbers for Bidirectional Chargers #176
Replies: 4 comments
|
Hello @StefanRiedAV, yes, CitrineOS should be able to handle negative numbers for bidirectional charging. Please give it a try, thank you! |
|
this is great news. I will definitely try this out. Unfortunately, some of the Bidi chargers prefer still OCPP 1.6J, and there is no handling of the ChargingProfile for OCPP 1.6J implemented in Citrine 1.8.x as far as I see. |
|
folks, If anybody needs the legacy OCPP 1.6J SetChargingProfile urgently, and has no time to implement or change a running installation, here's a little "hack" Due to the open and transparent architecture of Citrine, you can just blow the missing message in the RabbitMQ and it will be propagated to the Charger: I used this little script and started it with this command: The power requirement can actually also be a negative number if you have a bidi charger |
|
here's my PR for the working implementation |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Hi,
CitrineOS is exactly what I was looking for.
Thanks for sharing and developing it. You are great!
We are currently running a POC with bidirektional charger.
(I know this is really cool finally in OCPP 2.1 with the DER definitions...)
Until this the vendors of bidi charges agreed to handle negative numbers in OCPP1.6J Charging Profiles.
I am wondering (before we invest a lot of testing time), if the citrineOS-core handles negative numbers end2end, of it I need to patch much in the core.
Anybody used it for bidi control already?
Thanks for your feedback.
Stefan
All reactions