Skip to content

[release-4.21] OCPBUGS-87002: Replace HTTP backend liveness check with admin socket check#786

Merged
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 2 commits into
openshift:release-4.21from
openshift-cherrypick-robot:cherry-pick-737-to-release-4.21
Jun 5, 2026
Merged

[release-4.21] OCPBUGS-87002: Replace HTTP backend liveness check with admin socket check#786
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 2 commits into
openshift:release-4.21from
openshift-cherrypick-robot:cherry-pick-737-to-release-4.21

Conversation

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This is an automated cherry-pick of #737

/assign Miciah

/cherrypick release-4.20

alebedev87 and others added 2 commits June 3, 2026 15:11
…check

Use HAProxy admin socket `show version` command for the liveness probe
instead of sending an HTTP request to the backend. This directly tests
whether the HAProxy process is alive and responsive, rather than
testing through the data plane.

The HTTP-based liveness check counts against HAProxy's maxconn limit.
When maxconn is reached due to client traffic, the liveness probe HTTP
request gets queued or rejected, causing probe failures and unnecessary
container restarts even though HAProxy is still running. The admin
socket is not subject to maxconn, so the liveness probe remains
reliable under high connection load.

The readiness probe continues to use the HTTP backend check.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Move the admin socket URL definition to the top of the Run method
and reuse it for the Prometheus collector ScrapeURI default, the
liveness probe, and the ConfigManager connection info. Remove the
hardcoded default from the haproxy metrics package.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository: openshift/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: e84f7bff-6059-4f38-8133-7de63baa59e7

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-67161 has been cloned as Jira Issue OCPBUGS-87002. Will retitle bug to link to clone.
/retitle [release-4.21] OCPBUGS-87002: Replace HTTP backend liveness check with admin socket check

Details

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #737

/assign Miciah

/cherrypick release-4.20

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot changed the title [release-4.21] OCPBUGS-67161: Replace HTTP backend liveness check with admin socket check [release-4.21] OCPBUGS-87002: Replace HTTP backend liveness check with admin socket check Jun 3, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/severity-critical Referenced Jira bug's severity is critical for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jun 3, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-87002, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.21.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.21.z)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note text is set and does not match the template
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-67161 is in the state Verified, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-67161 targets the "4.22.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.22.0
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @melvinjoseph86

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #737

/assign Miciah

/cherrypick release-4.20

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@Miciah

Miciah commented Jun 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This is a clean cherry-pick.

/approve
/lgtm

This is a low-medium risk backport that changes the internal implementation of the router controller's liveness check. It has no customer-facing impact except that it reduces the risk that the kubelet terminates and restarts a router pod that is under extreme load.

/label backport-risk-assessed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Jun 3, 2026
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 3, 2026
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Miciah

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 3, 2026
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@Miciah

Miciah commented Jun 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/hold
pending team discussion.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 4, 2026
@Miciah

Miciah commented Jun 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The team agreed that we can proceed with the backport.
/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 4, 2026
@melvinjoseph86

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tested with Cluster bot

➜ oc get clusterversion
NAME VERSION AVAILABLE PROGRESSING SINCE STATUS
version 4.21.0-0-2026-06-05-140540-test-ci-ln-3k53cjt-latest True False 114m Cluster version is 4.21.0-0-2026-06-05-140540-test-ci-ln-3k53cjt-latest

➜ oc get route
NAME HOST/PORT PATH SERVICES PORT TERMINATION WILDCARD
service-unsecure service-unsecure-default.apps.ci-ln-3k53cjt-76ef8.aws-4.ci.openshift.org service-unsecure http None
➜ curl -Ik http://service-unsecure-default.apps.ci-ln-3k53cjt-76ef8.aws-4.ci.openshift.org
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
server: nginx/1.20.2
date: Fri, 05 Jun 2026 17:27:59 GMT
content-type: text/html
content-length: 46
last-modified: Fri, 05 Jun 2026 17:27:02 GMT
etag: "6a2306e6-2e"
accept-ranges: bytes
set-cookie: a84fef2b01006bb7036c768d4a819999=487bdd5c95e0df28411843d7c99efcf6; path=/; HttpOnly
cache-control: private

send traffic

➜ oc rsh web-server-rc-74wzz
/ # hey -n 50000 -c 30000 http://service-unsecure-default.apps.ci-ln-3k53cjt-76ef8.aws-4.ci.openshift.org

Summary:
Total: 0.9555 secs
Slowest: 0.9122 secs
Fastest: 0.1398 secs
Average: 0.5429 secs
Requests/sec: 31398.0552

Total data: 124476 bytes
Size/request: 46 bytes

Response time histogram:
0.140 [1] |
0.217 [174] |■■■■■■■■■
0.294 [103] |■■■■■
0.372 [172] |■■■■■■■■■
0.449 [201] |■■■■■■■■■■
0.526 [565] |■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
0.603 [558] |■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
0.681 [45] |■■
0.758 [790] |■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
0.835 [31] |■■
0.912 [66] |■■■

Latency distribution:
10% in 0.2935 secs
25% in 0.4773 secs
50% in 0.5409 secs
75% in 0.7136 secs
90% in 0.7293 secs
95% in 0.7358 secs
99% in 0.8944 secs

Details (average, fastest, slowest):
DNS+dialup: 0.0767 secs, 0.1398 secs, 0.9122 secs
DNS-lookup: 0.2332 secs, 0.0000 secs, 0.5740 secs
req write: 0.0221 secs, 0.0000 secs, 0.4768 secs
resp wait: 0.1687 secs, 0.0059 secs, 0.4490 secs
resp read: 0.0181 secs, 0.0000 secs, 0.1065 secs

Status code distribution:
[200] 2706 responses

Error distribution:
[10041] Get "http://service-unsecure-default.apps.ci-ln-3k53cjt-76ef8.aws-4.ci.openshift.org": dial tcp 35.162.194.29:80: socket: too many open files
[17253] Get "http://service-unsecure-default.apps.ci-ln-3k53cjt-76ef8.aws-4.ci.openshift.org": dial tcp: lookup service-unsecure-default.apps.ci-ln-3k53cjt-76ef8.aws-4.ci.openshift.org on 172.30.0.10:53: no such host

/ # hey -n 50000 -c 30000 http://service-unsecure-default.apps.ci-ln-3k53cjt-76ef8.aws-4.ci.openshift.org

Summary:
Total: 2.2037 secs
Slowest: 2.1847 secs
Fastest: 0.7791 secs
Average: 1.1235 secs
Requests/sec: 13613.2389

Total data: 98762 bytes
Size/request: 46 bytes

Response time histogram:
0.779 [1] |
0.920 [129] |■■■■
1.060 [661] |■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
1.201 [1195] |■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
1.341 [35] |■
1.482 [0] |
1.622 [0] |
1.763 [0] |
1.904 [0] |
2.044 [67] |■■
2.185 [59] |■■

Latency distribution:
10% in 0.9450 secs
25% in 1.0257 secs
50% in 1.0898 secs
75% in 1.1220 secs
90% in 1.1616 secs
95% in 2.0295 secs
99% in 2.1724 secs

Details (average, fastest, slowest):
DNS+dialup: 0.3686 secs, 0.7791 secs, 2.1847 secs
DNS-lookup: 0.2813 secs, 0.0000 secs, 0.6911 secs
req write: 0.0207 secs, 0.0000 secs, 0.1926 secs
resp wait: 0.1659 secs, 0.0086 secs, 1.0510 secs
resp read: 0.0182 secs, 0.0000 secs, 0.2106 secs

Status code distribution:
[200] 2147 responses

Error distribution:
[26781] Get "http://service-unsecure-default.apps.ci-ln-3k53cjt-76ef8.aws-4.ci.openshift.org": dial tcp 35.162.194.29:80: socket: too many open files
[1072] Get "http://service-unsecure-default.apps.ci-ln-3k53cjt-76ef8.aws-4.ci.openshift.org": dial tcp: lookup service-unsecure-default.apps.ci-ln-3k53cjt-76ef8.aws-4.ci.openshift.org on 172.30.0.10:53: no such host

check the log, the router pod doesn't reload or restart, no issues of the health-check as well

➜ oc -n openshift-ingress logs router-default-5c8f77f699-v4t5h
I0605 16:24:35.178689 1 template.go:561] "msg"="starting router" "logger"="router" "version"="majorFromGit: \nminorFromGit: \ncommitFromGit: 6c4fb15bd\nversionFromGit: v0.0.0-unknown\ngitTreeState: dirty\nbuildDate: 2026-06-05T14:00:28Z\n"
I0605 16:24:35.179594 1 envvar.go:172] "Feature gate default state" feature="ClientsAllowCBOR" enabled=false
I0605 16:24:35.179610 1 envvar.go:172] "Feature gate default state" feature="ClientsPreferCBOR" enabled=false
I0605 16:24:35.179617 1 envvar.go:172] "Feature gate default state" feature="InOrderInformers" enabled=true
I0605 16:24:35.179623 1 envvar.go:172] "Feature gate default state" feature="InformerResourceVersion" enabled=false
I0605 16:24:35.179628 1 envvar.go:172] "Feature gate default state" feature="WatchListClient" enabled=false
I0605 16:24:35.181826 1 metrics.go:156] "msg"="router health and metrics port listening on HTTP and HTTPS" "address"="0.0.0.0:1936" "logger"="metrics"
I0605 16:24:35.184958 1 router.go:214] "msg"="creating a new template router" "logger"="template" "writeDir"="/var/lib/haproxy"
I0605 16:24:35.185054 1 router.go:298] "msg"="router will coalesce reloads within an interval of each other" "interval"="5s" "logger"="template"
I0605 16:24:35.185525 1 router.go:368] "msg"="watching for changes" "logger"="template" "path"="/etc/pki/tls/private"
I0605 16:24:35.185614 1 router.go:283] "msg"="router is including routes in all namespaces" "logger"="router"
I0605 16:24:35.204936 1 reflector.go:436] "Caches populated" type="*v1.EndpointSlice" reflector="github.com/openshift/router/pkg/router/controller/factory/factory.go:124"
I0605 16:24:35.216930 1 reflector.go:436] "Caches populated" type="*v1.Route" reflector="github.com/openshift/router/pkg/router/controller/factory/factory.go:124"
I0605 16:24:35.217549 1 reflector.go:436] "Caches populated" type="*v1.Service" reflector="github.com/openshift/router/pkg/router/template/service_lookup.go:33"
E0605 16:24:35.297581 1 haproxy.go:418] "Unhandled Error" err="can't scrape HAProxy: dial unix /var/lib/haproxy/run/haproxy.sock: connect: no such file or directory" logger="UnhandledError"
I0605 16:24:35.380450 1 router.go:665] "msg"="router reloaded" "logger"="template" "output"=" - Checking http://localhost:80 using PROXY protocol ...\n - Health check ok : 0 retry attempt(s).\n"
I0605 16:24:40.333677 1 router.go:665] "msg"="router reloaded" "logger"="template" "output"=" - Checking http://localhost:80 using PROXY protocol ...\n - Health check ok : 0 retry attempt(s).\n"
I0605 16:25:03.135164 1 router.go:665] "msg"="router reloaded" "logger"="template" "output"=" - Checking http://localhost:80 using PROXY protocol ...\n - Health check ok : 0 retry attempt(s).\n"

➜ Downloads oc -n openshift-ingress get pods
NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE
router-default-5c8f77f699-rcjll 1/1 Running 0 3m12s
router-default-5c8f77f699-v4t5h 1/1 Running 0 70m

Hence marking as verified
/verified by @mjoseph

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Jun 5, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@melvinjoseph86: This PR has been marked as verified by @mjoseph.

Details

In response to this:

Tested with Cluster bot

➜ oc get clusterversion
NAME VERSION AVAILABLE PROGRESSING SINCE STATUS
version 4.21.0-0-2026-06-05-140540-test-ci-ln-3k53cjt-latest True False 114m Cluster version is 4.21.0-0-2026-06-05-140540-test-ci-ln-3k53cjt-latest

➜ oc get route
NAME HOST/PORT PATH SERVICES PORT TERMINATION WILDCARD
service-unsecure service-unsecure-default.apps.ci-ln-3k53cjt-76ef8.aws-4.ci.openshift.org service-unsecure http None
➜ curl -Ik http://service-unsecure-default.apps.ci-ln-3k53cjt-76ef8.aws-4.ci.openshift.org
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
server: nginx/1.20.2
date: Fri, 05 Jun 2026 17:27:59 GMT
content-type: text/html
content-length: 46
last-modified: Fri, 05 Jun 2026 17:27:02 GMT
etag: "6a2306e6-2e"
accept-ranges: bytes
set-cookie: a84fef2b01006bb7036c768d4a819999=487bdd5c95e0df28411843d7c99efcf6; path=/; HttpOnly
cache-control: private

send traffic

➜ oc rsh web-server-rc-74wzz
/ # hey -n 50000 -c 30000 http://service-unsecure-default.apps.ci-ln-3k53cjt-76ef8.aws-4.ci.openshift.org

Summary:
Total: 0.9555 secs
Slowest: 0.9122 secs
Fastest: 0.1398 secs
Average: 0.5429 secs
Requests/sec: 31398.0552

Total data: 124476 bytes
Size/request: 46 bytes

Response time histogram:
0.140 [1] |
0.217 [174] |■■■■■■■■■
0.294 [103] |■■■■■
0.372 [172] |■■■■■■■■■
0.449 [201] |■■■■■■■■■■
0.526 [565] |■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
0.603 [558] |■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
0.681 [45] |■■
0.758 [790] |■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
0.835 [31] |■■
0.912 [66] |■■■

Latency distribution:
10% in 0.2935 secs
25% in 0.4773 secs
50% in 0.5409 secs
75% in 0.7136 secs
90% in 0.7293 secs
95% in 0.7358 secs
99% in 0.8944 secs

Details (average, fastest, slowest):
DNS+dialup: 0.0767 secs, 0.1398 secs, 0.9122 secs
DNS-lookup: 0.2332 secs, 0.0000 secs, 0.5740 secs
req write: 0.0221 secs, 0.0000 secs, 0.4768 secs
resp wait: 0.1687 secs, 0.0059 secs, 0.4490 secs
resp read: 0.0181 secs, 0.0000 secs, 0.1065 secs

Status code distribution:
[200] 2706 responses

Error distribution:
[10041] Get "http://service-unsecure-default.apps.ci-ln-3k53cjt-76ef8.aws-4.ci.openshift.org": dial tcp 35.162.194.29:80: socket: too many open files
[17253] Get "http://service-unsecure-default.apps.ci-ln-3k53cjt-76ef8.aws-4.ci.openshift.org": dial tcp: lookup service-unsecure-default.apps.ci-ln-3k53cjt-76ef8.aws-4.ci.openshift.org on 172.30.0.10:53: no such host

/ # hey -n 50000 -c 30000 http://service-unsecure-default.apps.ci-ln-3k53cjt-76ef8.aws-4.ci.openshift.org

Summary:
Total: 2.2037 secs
Slowest: 2.1847 secs
Fastest: 0.7791 secs
Average: 1.1235 secs
Requests/sec: 13613.2389

Total data: 98762 bytes
Size/request: 46 bytes

Response time histogram:
0.779 [1] |
0.920 [129] |■■■■
1.060 [661] |■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
1.201 [1195] |■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
1.341 [35] |■
1.482 [0] |
1.622 [0] |
1.763 [0] |
1.904 [0] |
2.044 [67] |■■
2.185 [59] |■■

Latency distribution:
10% in 0.9450 secs
25% in 1.0257 secs
50% in 1.0898 secs
75% in 1.1220 secs
90% in 1.1616 secs
95% in 2.0295 secs
99% in 2.1724 secs

Details (average, fastest, slowest):
DNS+dialup: 0.3686 secs, 0.7791 secs, 2.1847 secs
DNS-lookup: 0.2813 secs, 0.0000 secs, 0.6911 secs
req write: 0.0207 secs, 0.0000 secs, 0.1926 secs
resp wait: 0.1659 secs, 0.0086 secs, 1.0510 secs
resp read: 0.0182 secs, 0.0000 secs, 0.2106 secs

Status code distribution:
[200] 2147 responses

Error distribution:
[26781] Get "http://service-unsecure-default.apps.ci-ln-3k53cjt-76ef8.aws-4.ci.openshift.org": dial tcp 35.162.194.29:80: socket: too many open files
[1072] Get "http://service-unsecure-default.apps.ci-ln-3k53cjt-76ef8.aws-4.ci.openshift.org": dial tcp: lookup service-unsecure-default.apps.ci-ln-3k53cjt-76ef8.aws-4.ci.openshift.org on 172.30.0.10:53: no such host

check the log, the router pod doesn't reload or restart, no issues of the health-check as well

➜ oc -n openshift-ingress logs router-default-5c8f77f699-v4t5h
I0605 16:24:35.178689 1 template.go:561] "msg"="starting router" "logger"="router" "version"="majorFromGit: \nminorFromGit: \ncommitFromGit: 6c4fb15bd\nversionFromGit: v0.0.0-unknown\ngitTreeState: dirty\nbuildDate: 2026-06-05T14:00:28Z\n"
I0605 16:24:35.179594 1 envvar.go:172] "Feature gate default state" feature="ClientsAllowCBOR" enabled=false
I0605 16:24:35.179610 1 envvar.go:172] "Feature gate default state" feature="ClientsPreferCBOR" enabled=false
I0605 16:24:35.179617 1 envvar.go:172] "Feature gate default state" feature="InOrderInformers" enabled=true
I0605 16:24:35.179623 1 envvar.go:172] "Feature gate default state" feature="InformerResourceVersion" enabled=false
I0605 16:24:35.179628 1 envvar.go:172] "Feature gate default state" feature="WatchListClient" enabled=false
I0605 16:24:35.181826 1 metrics.go:156] "msg"="router health and metrics port listening on HTTP and HTTPS" "address"="0.0.0.0:1936" "logger"="metrics"
I0605 16:24:35.184958 1 router.go:214] "msg"="creating a new template router" "logger"="template" "writeDir"="/var/lib/haproxy"
I0605 16:24:35.185054 1 router.go:298] "msg"="router will coalesce reloads within an interval of each other" "interval"="5s" "logger"="template"
I0605 16:24:35.185525 1 router.go:368] "msg"="watching for changes" "logger"="template" "path"="/etc/pki/tls/private"
I0605 16:24:35.185614 1 router.go:283] "msg"="router is including routes in all namespaces" "logger"="router"
I0605 16:24:35.204936 1 reflector.go:436] "Caches populated" type="*v1.EndpointSlice" reflector="github.com/openshift/router/pkg/router/controller/factory/factory.go:124"
I0605 16:24:35.216930 1 reflector.go:436] "Caches populated" type="*v1.Route" reflector="github.com/openshift/router/pkg/router/controller/factory/factory.go:124"
I0605 16:24:35.217549 1 reflector.go:436] "Caches populated" type="*v1.Service" reflector="github.com/openshift/router/pkg/router/template/service_lookup.go:33"
E0605 16:24:35.297581 1 haproxy.go:418] "Unhandled Error" err="can't scrape HAProxy: dial unix /var/lib/haproxy/run/haproxy.sock: connect: no such file or directory" logger="UnhandledError"
I0605 16:24:35.380450 1 router.go:665] "msg"="router reloaded" "logger"="template" "output"=" - Checking http://localhost:80 using PROXY protocol ...\n - Health check ok : 0 retry attempt(s).\n"
I0605 16:24:40.333677 1 router.go:665] "msg"="router reloaded" "logger"="template" "output"=" - Checking http://localhost:80 using PROXY protocol ...\n - Health check ok : 0 retry attempt(s).\n"
I0605 16:25:03.135164 1 router.go:665] "msg"="router reloaded" "logger"="template" "output"=" - Checking http://localhost:80 using PROXY protocol ...\n - Health check ok : 0 retry attempt(s).\n"

➜ Downloads oc -n openshift-ingress get pods
NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE
router-default-5c8f77f699-rcjll 1/1 Running 0 3m12s
router-default-5c8f77f699-v4t5h 1/1 Running 0 70m

Hence marking as verified
/verified by @mjoseph

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot Bot merged commit f4c2ba8 into openshift:release-4.21 Jun 5, 2026
11 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue Verification Checks: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-87002
✔️ This pull request was pre-merge verified.
✔️ All associated pull requests have merged.
✔️ All associated, merged pull requests were pre-merge verified.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-87002 has been moved to the MODIFIED state and will move to the VERIFIED state when the change is available in an accepted nightly payload. 🕓

Details

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #737

/assign Miciah

/cherrypick release-4.20

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: new pull request created: #789

Details

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #737

/assign Miciah

/cherrypick release-4.20

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-merge-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fix included in release 4.21.0-0.nightly-2026-06-05-205942

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. jira/severity-critical Referenced Jira bug's severity is critical for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants