Repository navigation
Trainer Agreement comments and notes #114
Replies: 2 comments
|
Noting some meeting minutes that capture previous concerns from trainers: July-August 2020 |
|
this is structured for readabilty, but represents rough brainstorming level ideas, not a firm plan yet, all of this is subject to revision and some of it is incomplete One thought is that the current "Trainer Agreement" is doing a lot of work. There are two key functions that I'd like to separate out during this year's update:
These two things are not totally unrelated and so I think the current definition of "units" is useful to carry across both steps and TBD where that definition lives. In the actual update process trainers would:
We could have the "minimum to be active" be fewer units than what's in the current agreement or keep it at the same level. If we have a lower active bar, we should think carefully about incentives around people doing above and beyond that (other than those whose time is actually included in a membership. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
At the May trainers leadership meeting, we decided to assess what changes need to be done to the trainer agreement while we find a committee to work on the update process. We'll use that process to facilitate the updates that we work out here.
Link to current trainer agreement
All reactions